Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terry McAuliffe elected governor of Virginia, defeats conservative Ken Cuccinelli
Washington Examiner ^ | November 6, 2013 | Rebecca Berg

Posted on 11/05/2013 10:44:22 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

TYSONS CORNER -- Terry McAuliffe, the former Democratic fundraiser and confidant of Bill and Hillary Clinton, will be Virginia's next governor after defeating his conservative opponent, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, on Tuesday in a race that confirmed the state's status as an increasingly blue battleground.

The marquee contest was marked throughout by historically high spending, a relentless barrage of attacks on both sides and campaign trail cameos by some of the nation's most prominent political figures.

With more than 99 percent of precincts reporting, McAuliffe led Cuccinelli by less than 2 percent — 48 percent to 46 percent — or roughly 40,000 votes.

“This race was never a choice between Democrats or Republicans,” McAuliffe said in his victory speech to an excited crowd of supporters in a hotel ballroom. “It was a choice about whether Virginia would continue the mainstream bipartisan tradition that has served us so well over the past decade.”

Democrat Ralph Northam was elected as the state's next lieutenant governor, unofficial returns showed. He defeated Republican E.W. Jackson, a Baptist minister whose controversial past statements on hot-button issues like gay rights and abortion made him an easy target for Democrats.

Democrats did not sweep all three top statewide offices, however. Mark Obenshain, the Republican candidate for attorney general, led Democrat Mark Herring by 2 percent with 94 percent of the precincts counted.

But it was the McAuliffe-Cuccinelli showdown that captured the national attention of both Democrats and Republicans looking for early indications of voter attitudes and potential campaign strategies ahead of the 2014 congressional elections.

McAuliffe, a former Democratic National Committee chairman and friend and fundraiser for the Clintons, easily outspent Cuccinelli by nearly 2-to-1, allowing him to fund a barrage of attack ads that portrayed Cuccinelli as an ideological extremist.

McAuliffe also benefited from a highly effective get-out-the-vote effort that, in an election that hinged on turnout, helped push participation levels beyond that of the last gubernatorial campaign in 2009 and closer to the 2012 presidential election's levels.

One measure of the race's status as the most competitive race in the off-year elections nationwide was the parade of political celebrities who made their way to the Old Dominion's campaign trail.

President Obama and the Clintons, among others, campaigned with and raised cash for McAuliffe. A trio of Tea Party heroes — Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ted Cruz of Texas, and Marco Rubio of Florida — were among those standing with Cuccinelli.

The Virginia race played out against a political backdrop of a government shutdown, gridlocked Congress and internal feud between conservative and moderate Republicans. McAuliffe tried to tie Cuccinelli to Washington’s problems, including the conservative-driven shutdown. Cuccinelli, meanwhile, linked McAuliffe to the increasingly unpopular Obama and the president’s troubled health care reforms. On the eve of the election, Cuccinelli declared his race to be a referendum on Obamacare.

"This race came down to the wire because of Obamacare," Cuccinelli said Tuesday.

McAuliffe’s fundraising advantage was clearly paying dividends, particularly late in the race when it mattered most. During the week of Oct. 28, McAuliffe’s campaign ran roughly 2,500 TV ads — spending about as much as Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican, did to win in 2009 — compared with 1,500 aired by Cuccinelli’s campaign.

Polls in the final days of the election showed McAuliffe leading Cuccinelli by roughly 6 to 7 percentage points.

In addition to enduring the advertising blitz, Cuccinelli was also hamstrung by a conservative record that alienated moderate and independent voters — and by more than a few of his fellow Republicans who backed McAuliffe.

The strain between Cuccinelli and much of the rest of his party was fueled by Cuccinelli’s successful effort to change the Republican nominating process from an open primary that favored a moderate candidate to a closed convention dominated by his conservative supporters.

McAuliffe faced his own obstacles, including his ties to GreenTech Automotive, a company he helped found that was the subject of a federal investigation into whether he obtained special treatment for the company from the federal government.

Some voters were left dissatisfied with both candidates and drove Robert Sarvis, a libertarian candidate whose candidacy offered voters turned off by McAuliffe and Cuccinelli a none-of-the-above option. Unofficial returns showed Sarvis winning about 7 percent of the vote.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; cuccinelli; grifter; kencuccinelli; mcauliffe; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Salvavida

the democrats spent 30 million combined in addition to financing a third party to convince three percent of the population in VA that a man wanted to do something he never said he wanted to do (ban abortions), wanted to ban something he can’t ban (birth control) and that a family man who is an attorney general wanted to give felons illegal guns to kill you and your children.

They only won a plurality by three percent.


61 posted on 11/06/2013 5:32:58 AM PST by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: chimera

I read you. I’ve been up all night in withdrawal and aftermath of this ride. As I was leaving the poll I passed a harried young woman carrying a child and herding another. Did her vote cancel mine? I can live with that but not this sleeezy nasty game they played on Virginia and the rest of US.


62 posted on 11/06/2013 6:03:47 AM PST by noodler (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: KevinB
Then why did the GoPe not support him?

It's pretty clear that they simply don't want to win. Fundraising is more important to them than governing, and they can get suckers to pony up more money when they are out of power by playing on people's fears. "Help us fight all the terrible things Obama is doing" brings in more cash than "everything's great, help us keep the status quo". They pay themselves quite well out of the money people contribute.

63 posted on 11/06/2013 6:10:32 AM PST by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: noodler

Also; right out of the box, didn’t McAuffus refer to Cuccinelli as a “fine and decent man” in his acceptance speech? Just where did he Lie first?


64 posted on 11/06/2013 6:13:38 AM PST by noodler (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This is a failure of the eGOP. We need no more proof that the Republican party has left the conservatives and went liberal. The Republican party refuses to support TEA Party supported candidates. Screw the Republican party!


65 posted on 11/06/2013 6:26:57 AM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chimera

“The voters put them there. We have to face the fact that with the present makeup of the electorate on a national level, we are a minority.”

That’s a completely wrong assessment.

Republicans and conservatives control 26 states, while rats control 11. In many states, rats don’t hold a single state-wide office.

What we’re seeing is a massive but slow movement of the population into states that reflect specific political and economic beliefs. For example, Michigan lost about 600,000 citizens in the period between 2000 and 2008. Most of them were the conservative working class and entrepreneurs. Those people moved to conservative leaning states and bolstered the conservative credentials of those states.

The population is dividing ideologically much as it did prior to the Civil War.


66 posted on 11/06/2013 6:35:06 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad
Agreed. But I'm speaking of a segment of the population that is dumb enough to being hoodwinked. I speak of a segment that doesn't require money thrown at them: they are only going to vote one way, and that is for the handouts. They will not vote for a party that even suggests the enforcement of immigration. It's not in their interests, and it will never be.

In 2011, the foreign born represented 11.1 percent of Virginia's total population. In 2011, 11.1 percent of Virginia's total population were immigrants, compared to 8.1 percent in 2000 and 5.0 percent in 1990.

Of the total immigrant population in Virginia, 26.5 percent entered during the 1990s, and 43.0 percent entered in 2000 or later. Let that one sink it.

Of the foreign-born population resident in Virginia in 2011, 14.3 percent entered the country prior to 1980, 16.2 percent between 1980 and 1989, 26.5 percent between 1990 and 1999, and 43.0 percent in 2000 or later.

In Virginia, 86.1 percent of the immigrants who entered before 1980 were citizens, compared to 17.6 percent of those who entered in 2000 or later.

There's your 3%, and then some. And guess what? It's climbing. Every year. By way of Dulles International Airport, and a policy of non-enforcement. And there is nothing we can do about it.

Welcome to Rome.

67 posted on 11/06/2013 7:12:49 AM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark

Conservatives losing these elections is not because they are poor candidates. It’s the rotted populace.


You are absolutely right. The “rotted populace” is exactly right.


68 posted on 11/06/2013 8:00:05 AM PST by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The malignant cancer that is NOVA continues to spread. So do I retire to Virginia and add my vote in defense of her, or retire to a less purple state. NOVA is rapidly destroying my planned retirement state.


69 posted on 11/06/2013 9:47:29 AM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Free goodies for all -- Freedom for none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: warchild9

Exactly! It is Jeb’s “turn” and he will continue our plunge into socialism unabated.


70 posted on 11/06/2013 9:51:53 AM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Free goodies for all -- Freedom for none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Socialism infers we receive something in return for political quiescence.

The 1%’ers are parasites, that will kill us, eventually.

/Note: the Bushes are instruments of the parasites, not 1%’ers, themselves. For instannce, W’s net worth of 17 million is pocket change to the tens of billions controlled by the real Masters of the Universe.
//removes tinfoil hat


71 posted on 11/06/2013 10:25:27 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: KevinB

“..Do not ever send money to the RNC.”

Agreed, and tell them why when they call us for $$.


73 posted on 11/06/2013 9:53:10 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw

“..The Libertarian party did nothing to disavow him,”

The Libertarian Party obviously cares more about their party than what’s best for Virginia.

And the RNC is disgusting as well.

I received this from a CatholicVote.org email:

“The national GOP spent approximately $3 million on this race vs. $9 million spent in 2009”

SHAMEFUL!


74 posted on 11/06/2013 9:58:48 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

The RNC only likes liberal or moderate Republicans.

I’ll repeat part of my last post for you:

From a CatholicVote.org email:

“The national GOP spent approximately $3 million on this race vs. $9 million spent in 2009”


75 posted on 11/06/2013 10:02:00 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

I’m days late but the recount to whoever Sharp to beat Obensheim means something. I don’t even know off-hand his name correctly yet he is in this close recount.
THEY are finding all kinds of problems in the recount. They “said” that they are not partisan. The recount should have been about the Governor too.


76 posted on 11/08/2013 11:15:35 PM PST by noodler (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: noodler

It doesn’t make feakin sense.


77 posted on 11/08/2013 11:19:12 PM PST by noodler (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Another thing which doesn’t make sense is all segments splitting apart and criticizing each other.This is WAR. The enemy is united and cement together like insects. They pick us off, one by one, like the hordes as times before. They are stupid like insects for repeating the plan of eating their hosts.


78 posted on 11/08/2013 11:36:38 PM PST by noodler (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: noodler
Another thing which doesn’t make sense is all segments splitting apart and criticizing each other.

It's a recipe for never winning another national election.

79 posted on 11/08/2013 11:39:36 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: noodler

From that comes another situation. I don’t think it will be eating bark before it’s ratting out your neighbor. For Anything when the squeeze starts.


80 posted on 11/08/2013 11:44:38 PM PST by noodler (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson