Skip to comments.
Senate votes 100-0 to move ahead on debate over Obamacare
Los Angeles Times ^
| 09/25/2013
| Lisa Mascaro
Posted on 09/25/2013 10:54:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Edited on 09/25/2013 11:03:36 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
The Senate easily overcame Wednesday
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 113th; bhohealthcare; budget; cruz; mcconnell; obamacare; reid; senate; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: SeekAndFind
100-0? After all that, Cruz voted to move the measure forward?
Am I missing something?
2
posted on
09/25/2013 10:56:26 AM PDT
by
Personal Responsibility
(Government: Slimy used car salesmen writing laws forcing you to buy their cars)
To: SeekAndFind
This was NOT the cloture vote Cruz wants to stop!
That will come Friday or Saturday.
(Seems to be a lot of confusion on this...)
3
posted on
09/25/2013 10:56:28 AM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: mrsmith
4
posted on
09/25/2013 10:57:20 AM PDT
by
clamper1797
(Evil WILL flourish when good men WILL not act)
To: SeekAndFind
Procedural vote, only good for Senators to propagandize in their home states. And Lisa Mascara of the LA Times/Pravda Left Coast proceeds to spew lies disproven again and again.
To: SeekAndFind
“lonely filibuster-like campaign”
yesterday an article said a “Powerful group of Senators” were doing it.
SO now its a one-man campaign again.
lolz
6
posted on
09/25/2013 10:59:20 AM PDT
by
GeronL
To: mrsmith
This was NOT the cloture vote Cruz wants to stop! That will come Friday or Saturday. Whew! I'm relieved to see this statement, because I was worried, not to mention puzzled by the numbers. Can you explain the cloture issue for me, if you have time, or point me to a good explanation? I've been a little distracted here, but I'd like to know what to look for. Thanks.
7
posted on
09/25/2013 11:00:00 AM PDT
by
MissNomer
To: Personal Responsibility
Deceptive reporting. Cruz, in fact, introduced TWO unanimous consent measures (which Reid rejected) that were SPECIFICALLY designed to speed up the process and get to the actual vote.
8
posted on
09/25/2013 11:00:15 AM PDT
by
bolobaby
To: SeekAndFind
9
posted on
09/25/2013 11:01:00 AM PDT
by
TangledUpInBlue
(I have no home. I'm the wind.)
To: SeekAndFind
Cruz voted for this? So, what was the point?
I have an uncomfortable feeling this whole thing was about maximum TV time for Cruz and a possible Presidential run. From what I'm seeing here, it's working.
To: Personal Responsibility
Please note this is the LA Times.
11
posted on
09/25/2013 11:01:47 AM PDT
by
Hostage
(Be Breitbart!)
To: mrsmith
(Seems to be a lot of confusion on this...)
As much as Harry Reid can manufacture by coming up with arcane rules, roadblocks, and objections.
12
posted on
09/25/2013 11:01:49 AM PDT
by
Idaho_Cowboy
(Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
To: Personal Responsibility
At minimum, this would be 98-2 (Cruz & Lee) if it was an actual cloture vote. It is not. The senate knows they have to throw the house some bone to move the funding forward. It remains to be seen what the bone will be.
Perhaps some minor delay in implementation. Perhaps a repeal on the tax on medical devices. Something.
13
posted on
09/25/2013 11:03:14 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: colorado tanker
That's because you are listening to the liars in the MSM. They are lying to confuse you. Like they always do.
And so many freepers buy into it.
/johnny
To: Personal Responsibility
My thought too. Evidently this isn’t the biggie.
15
posted on
09/25/2013 11:04:51 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(This post coming to you today from behind the Camelskin Curtain. Not the Iron or Bamboo Curtain...)
To: SeekAndFind
LA Times? really??? Even Dr. Drew bashed them and refuses to read their propaganda.
16
posted on
09/25/2013 11:05:10 AM PDT
by
Mozilla
To: SeekAndFind
The media is not being honest on this. But then again, if they were honest, they would not be the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party, would they?
17
posted on
09/25/2013 11:05:12 AM PDT
by
sport
To: Personal Responsibility
This was the motion to proceed (to debate), basically bringing the bill to the floor.
In the old days there would have been an actual debate, but now, Reid files for cloture at the same time he files a bill so he can call for an end to debate whenever he wants, which is usually after the mandatory 30 hours of debate, i.e. the next morning or afternoon.
To: colorado tanker
This is not cloture, just a vote to permit debate.
19
posted on
09/25/2013 11:05:50 AM PDT
by
piytar
(The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
To: Personal Responsibility
Washington does a kabuki dance. Senate rules. They are distorted and complex. Most of the Senators don't even understand them. It has been 100 years of chess. Of move and counter move. Don't like the rules? expand on them. It is meant to confuse. The senators aides are paid to find loopholes.
Government is too big and we need to stand behind Ted Cruz.
If we all just pick up the phone and call, get on their facebook page or tweet your Senator we might have a chance. If you sit there and do nothing, this may be it.
20
posted on
09/25/2013 11:07:32 AM PDT
by
lucky american
(The Democrats will follow the big "D"even if it means going over a cliff.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson