You're speaking of yourself, of course?
You have, it appears, only one major function here, and that is to mock & insult those who disagree, even when they agree!
You're on a mission, it seems -- a "search and destroy" -- and so there's no room in your Rules of Engagement for even attempting to understand -- you take no prisoners, do you?
And so now we can easily guess where your vast library of "mockings" listed in your post #134 comes from -- you mock, insult and provoke until you get a response-in-kind, and then you deposit another "victory" in your troll-library, right?
And you get paid for doing this, or is mocking just your idea of "fun"?
YHAOS: "I dont know who you think youre kidding, but it is not anyone on this thread with whom you are currently corresponding."
What, are you speaking of yourself again?
Your powers of "projection" are truly amazing, FRiend.
YHAOS: "You are seizing the ideas expressed by others, claiming them as your own, and then, in turn, presuming to instruct them on their own ideas as though their thoughts are your property."
I'm sorry, FRiend, if you thoroughly misunderstand what Free Republic is all about -- it's the internet equivalent of normal people sitting around in their family room, watching TV news and discussing topics they feel passionately about.
Every one of us knows some facts and everyone has opinions, which we attempt to express in the most coherent ways possible.
None of us claim that our opinions are "original", indeed most take a certain pride in loyally expressing views first developed by others, sometimes even thousands of years ago.
If you have a big problem with that, then just maybe Free Republic is not your real home?
YHAOS: "Typical of a two-bit politician, you also seem to think getting out in front of the parade deceives everyone into believing you are leading it."
And this refers to what, exactly?
YHAOS: "how do other similar words, such as effective hunter-gatherers equate with vicious predatory animal? "
see my posts #228 & 257.
If you wish to learn more, then you'll first need to answer my question (#257): "what, exactly, you mean by the phrase: 'vicious predatory animal.' "
YHAOS: "In post #200m this thread, you allege no new quotes since February of 2009, How Much Longer Dan They Sell Darwinism? FR, and you set the standard for new quotes to be four years (or less).
Prove what you allege."
As is typical of YHAOS, you again misrepresent the facts, which are:
"And in the FOUR YEARS since, you can produce no new quotes?
And you have no quotes from this thread?"
Please note, FRiend, in item #8 above, the question marks on the two sentences which you describe as "allegations".
They are not "allegations", they are questions to you, which, like most of my questions, you utterly refuse to answer.
Because that's who YHAOS is, it's what you do, right?
You're here to mock & insult, not reasonably discuss, right?
On that subject of mockery, let me refer you to many scripture verses, especially Proverbs 9: 7-12.
Man, what an ego fight all around this has turned into.
I suggest glorifying God as best we can, and settling differences or at least agreeing that we have come as close as we can, in a gracious manner. The exact manner of creation is one of those riddles that we can speculate about, but can’t pin down with the knowledge at hand. Many YEC advocates have attempted to pin it down anyhow, and while they produce an interesting theory, we lack the evidential wherewithal to put total trust in it. The best we can do is give it an emphatic maybe, and that’s only if they have managed to avoid obvious errors.
They are not allegations, they are questions to you, which, like most of my questions, you utterly refuse to answer.
Ive answered your questions. But not in the manner you anticipated, and therefore, not to your pleasure. Im not here to please you.
Allegations in the form of questions are a common technique. William Buckley Jr. dealt with this obvious Liberal tactic fifty years ago when he exposed the dishonest and personal attacks of Hubert The Hump Humphrey. Everyone could see what The Hump was doing. Buckley named it for what it was.
In post #200 this thread, you allege no new quotes since February of 2009, How Much Longer Can They Sell Darwinism? FR, and you set the standard for new quotes to be four years (or less). Prove what you allege. (third request)
Aside from your exception, how do other similar words, such as effective hunter-gatherers equate with vicious predatory animal? (third request)