[YHAOS]

In addition to your intellectual claim jumping, apparently you believe the sincere to be at a disadvantage when dealing with the insincere. On the surface, this seems to be true, so those who look only at the surface are fooled.

“They are not “allegations”, they are questions to you, which, like most of my questions, you utterly refuse to answer.”

I’ve answered your questions. But not in the manner you anticipated, and therefore, not to your pleasure. I’m not here to please you.

Allegations in the form of questions are a common technique. William Buckley Jr. dealt with this obvious Liberal tactic fifty years ago when he exposed the dishonest and personal attacks of Hubert “The Hump” Humphrey. Everyone could see what “The Hump” was doing. Buckley named it for what it was.

In post #200 this thread, you allege no new quotes since February of 2009, How Much Longer Can They Sell Darwinism? FR, and you set the standard for “new quotes” to be four year’s (or less). Prove what you allege. (third request)

Aside from your exception, how do “other similar words,” such as “effective hunter-gatherers” equate with “vicious predatory animal”? (third request)

[HiTech RedNeck]

COOL IT, you are making humanity look like fools.

[BroJoeK]

YHAOS: "Allegations in the form of questions are a common technique.
William Buckley Jr. dealt with this obvious Liberal tactic fifty years ago..."

Sorry, but despite your cynical appeal to Buckley, the fact remains that a question is a question, is a still question, and you won't answer it, refuse to answer even a simple "yes" or "no" -- all the while repeating your own "questions" that have already been answered, in great detail.

YHAOS: "I’m not here to please you."

Well, then, that sort of explains everything, doesn't it?
And you were demanding answers from me?