[BroJoeK]

Kevmo: "When Romans 16 mentions Erastus as the city Treasurer and we can see for ourselves an inscription that says exactly the same thing, it is an intersection with undeniable historicity."

Of course, and there are plenty of other examples similar to that.
All of those examples qualify as pure "history".
But they are still part of the religious message taught by the Bible.

Do you "get" that: the Bible is 100% religion, much of which can be confirmed historically and scientifically?
Really, that's not a difficult concept to grasp, if you put your mind to it.

[Kevmo]

All of those examples qualify as pure “history”.
***You’re an idiot. Just a couple of posts ago you said that all of the bible is religion. Now you’re backtracking, yet again. I don’t really care because at the end of the story you’ll be pushing a heresy. T4BTT