All of those examples qualify as pure “history”.
***You’re an idiot. Just a couple of posts ago you said that all of the bible is religion. Now you’re backtracking, yet again. I don’t really care because at the end of the story you’ll be pushing a heresy. T4BTT
Obviously at least one of us is and idiot, or worse.
I'd say it's the fellow who refuses to understand the simple fact that: the Bible is 100% religious, some portions of which can be verified through strict historical or archaeological analysis.
It is the nature of religion not to require such verifications, but they are still nice to see, whenever they happen.