state law??? i though it was FEDERAL law...Had he been declared mentally incompetent, he wouldn’t have even got that.
So, how did that work out for us Libs?
Were lives saved? LMAO
What a great victory you won here Lefties. GAG!
As usual, the good guys were disarmed. The bad guy
got access to weapons and then it was open season.
/johnny
They can’t stop working that AR15 angle!
Watch them turn this into: Racist Southern Jim Crow-style law keeps black veteran from buying more effective firearm.
More lies!
The SOB was a NEW YORKER, for the record!
Old Grey Whore lies again.
OMG! Not just any shotgun, but a law-enforcement-style shotgun!
A long gun is a long gun.
When the FBI is called for a NICS check no distinction is made between the two.
They only ask long gun or pistol.
I think these cops are full of crap.
When someone is hell-bent on creating mayhem, only an alert and prepared populace is sufficient to stop them. No law, no ban, will ever trump the workaround.
The murdering scum wanted an AR-15 so therefore according to the enemedia and the gun-grabbers he used one to kill these people.
Emotions override reality for both.
Ah, the MSM!
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2013/09/washington-navy-yard-shooting-gun-control-debate-reignited-94098.html
(The Associated Press slurping Obama as usual):
“For Obama, it was at least the seventh mass shooting of his presidency, and **he wearily mourned** the victims while speaking at the White House.”
Reggie, time for another vacay!
I have a Remington 870 shotgun and slugs for it - should I assume I am a criminal? Is that becoming the criteria? As in someone uses a certain weapon to shoot people so that means if you have a weapon like that, you also are a killer waiting to happen?
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
“law-enforcement-style shotgun” LMAO
Mine could actually fit that description. Mine is an exact copy of the one in this video and I doubt very much that Obama’s son lookalike put one on these together.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=oW5LfKBGfio
state law??? i though it was FEDERAL law...http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/17/miller-new-york-times-gets-it-wrong-about-navy-yar/
NYT made up the AR-15 story.
So? Stopping him from purchasing the *assault rifle* didn’t prevent him from killing more than a dozen people now did it? Idiots.
He had mental issues and should have been under CLOSE surveillance.
I hear that his 3'rd cousin's neighbor's sister-in-law attended Rev. Wright's church 9 times. I think that's the cause.
While it is true that Alexis rented and shot an AR-type rifle at Sharpshooters Small Arms Range in Lorton, sources close to the investigation tell me that he did not attempt to buy the rifle.
Instead, he passed both the federal and state background checks and bought a Remington 870 shotgun and 15 shotgun shells, which he used, tragically, kill 12 innocent people.
The Times’ mistakes indicate the paper is trying to give the impression only some unexplained “assault weapon” ban in Virginia stopped Alexis from killing more people. The truth is that we have thousands of gun laws on the books, but none of them stopped a homicidal maniac intent on mass murder.
More actual evidence and facts that have to be ignored as the gun grabbers make emotional appeals to families across America in order to trample over the Constitution even more than they have for the past several decades.