Skip to comments.
It really is hands free! Self-driving Mercedes-Benz is unveiled - and it should be available within
The Mail ^
| 07:02 EST, 12 September 2013
| Ellie Zolfagharifard
Posted on 09/13/2013 9:54:52 AM PDT by null and void
The driverless S-Class was able to deal with some difficult situations involving traffic lights, roundabouts, pedestrians, cyclists and trams
A particular challenge for autonomous vehicles is the way in which they communicate and interact with other cars.
'This sometimes results in comical situations, such as when, having stopped at a zebra crossing, the vehicle gets waved through by the pedestrian yet our car stoically continues to wait, because we failed to anticipate such politeness when we programmed the system.'
Scientists at Oxford University are working with Nissan in Sunderland to create robotcars that can drive themselves independently using details of the road they are driving on stored in on-board software.
The Nissan self-drive Leaf electric car is controlled by an iPad, and the Oxford team behind it claim the technology could be installed in mainstream cars as a £60 option.
Cameras and lasers built into its chassis map a 3D model of its surroundings when it is driven manually, which is fed into a computer stored in the boot.
A laser at the front scans 164ft ahead 13 times per second for obstacles, such as pedestrians, cyclists, or other cars in an 85-degree field of view.
If it senses an obstacle, it slows and comes to a controlled stop. The driver can tap the brake pedal to regain control of the vehicle from the computer.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: AtlasStalled
But then again I dont understand why some people want an automatic rather than standard transmission. Life's too short for stick shifts.And besides...how could I text and drive with a stick?
To: null and void
If my math is right, 164ft at 60 MPH offers 2 seconds to stop, sensing an obstruction.
Have to be pretty quick and woe be unto the occupants... or drive at 25 MPH.
To: null and void
They have zebras in the UK?
23
posted on
09/13/2013 10:35:15 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
To: AtlasStalled
24
posted on
09/13/2013 10:36:08 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
To: Doogle
Speaking of the Stooges. In “Oily to Rise” they are in the back seat of a car with no one driving and as they are about to go over a cliff Curly says:”Don’t look now but I think we’re about to be killed.”
25
posted on
09/13/2013 10:36:31 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Dr. Sivana
The vehicle I’m using today has two brake actuators.
26
posted on
09/13/2013 10:38:33 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
To: Rennes Templar
I think it's great:
- No more speeding tickets.
- Fewer traffic cops to pay for.
- Fewer accidents.
- A lot less auto body shops and money wasted on repairs.
- A lot less medical care needed for fewer accident patients.
- Fewer ambulance chasing lawyers.
- Fewer traffic courts.
- Fewer disability cases due to car accidents.
- People are freed to be productive during the car ride.
- Elderly who can no longer drive safely can now get around safely.
- Elderly that would need someone to drive them to the doctor can now go by themselves.
- Youth that need to get to ball practice can do so by themselves.
- Low cost driverless delivery vehicles would be possible.
27
posted on
09/13/2013 10:38:41 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: dalereed
Youve never had to drive 40,000 miles a year in Los Angeles!! I drove 52,000 miles a year back in the 60s, mostly nighttime, on rural roads in Wisconsin. I tried to avoid expressways and major highways as that's where the speed cops hung out. My Opel was equipped w/ Quartz Iodide headlamps and driving lights as wandering deer were the greatest hazard. Winter wasn't too bad as "studded tires" were still legal. When the DOT banned studs I moved closer to work.
Regards,
GtG
28
posted on
09/13/2013 10:41:27 AM PDT
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: AtlasStalled
Driving is fun most of the time. Sometimes it stinks. Last year due to family illness I did 3 cross country trips in 6 weeks, I wouldn’t have minded letting the car do its own driving for most of that, especially the late night second drive home. Speaking of late night drives home, I go up to Phoenix for concerts a lot, but driving back right after the concert is starting to wear on the aging brain and body, soon those concerts will have to include a hotel room, which means fewer concerts; a self driving car would fix that. I’d drive my own car probably 99% of the time, but that 1% of the time I’d let the car do the work would be wonderful.
29
posted on
09/13/2013 10:42:12 AM PDT
by
discostu
(This is why we have ants!)
To: WayneS; moose07
They have zebras in the UK? Yes. They are cross...
And a foreign student said to me --
Was it really true
there are elephants and lions too
In Piccadilly Circus?
30
posted on
09/13/2013 10:42:38 AM PDT
by
null and void
(I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
To: null and void
Now the blind person with their gun can go to the shooting range!
Not that there’s anything wrong with that!
31
posted on
09/13/2013 10:43:24 AM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
To: Kozak
No problem...you weren’t driving!
32
posted on
09/13/2013 10:44:23 AM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
To: DannyTN
Government can hack in to your car’s computer and send it hurling off a bridge, just because the emperor doesn’t like you.
33
posted on
09/13/2013 10:45:22 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
To: WayneS
" Government can hack in to your cars computer and send it hurling off a bridge, just because the emperor doesnt like you."They apparently can already do that on some cars now that are not self-driving. And they can also tamper with your car for any model without it being self-driving.
We need checks and balances on government, not limitation on technology.
34
posted on
09/13/2013 10:51:28 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: WayneS
" Government can hack in to your cars computer and send it hurling off a bridge, just because the emperor doesnt like you."They apparently can already do that on some cars now that are not self-driving. And they can also tamper with your car for any model without it being self-driving.
We need checks and balances on government, not limitation on technology.
35
posted on
09/13/2013 10:51:28 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: Dr. Sivana
To: WayneS
The vehicle Im using today has two brake actuators.
I've never heard of that. how do you activate the second actuator, and when would you use it?
37
posted on
09/13/2013 11:03:44 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: Sacajaweau
http://www.nhtsa.gov/Research/Light+Vehicle+Antilock+Brake+Systems+(ABS)+Research+Program
Those docs are over ten years old. Since then, ABS has gotten better, and the drivers use it better.
By the way, I am NOT one of those put every new gizmo into every car. I spent much of my driving mileage in 1966 Dodge Darts (not known for its hefty brake system), and loving it. Every so often, a technology gets widely deployed that works. Fuel Injection and ABS seem to be two of them. Now if GM can only make an electric window that lasts more than ten years ...
And bring back brench seats!
38
posted on
09/13/2013 11:09:56 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: massgopguy
39
posted on
09/13/2013 11:14:39 AM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: DannyTN
All good until the cars computer gets a virus!
40
posted on
09/13/2013 11:15:32 AM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
(Seen any scandal headlines lately?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson