[lavaroise]

So buggering is equality?

[FlingWingFlyer]

You can go back to sleep now, Ruthie.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Women are not a minority in this country.

[RetiredArmy]

Ginsberg has bought herself a one way ticket to hell and the lake of fire. That is exactly what the idiot has done.

[Amendment10]

Ginsburg said equality has always been central to the Constitution, even if society has only applied it to minorities—be they women, blacks or gays—over time.

With all due respect to Ginsburg, she is in a fantasy world.

Remember, equality issues got started in Genesis 3:5 imo.

Regarding the Constitution, Ginsburg ignores that the so-called equality aspect of the Constitution is based on PC interpretations of the Constitution by corrupt lawmakers to win votes from low-informations citizens.

[Vaduz]

More proof that Supreme Court Justices should be on term limits.

[MasterGunner01]

Dear Justice Ginsburg: The Framers wrote the Constitution to be read and understood by us common folks. The fact that lawyers cannot understand it because it is written plainly indicates that you are a mental midget and have no business on the SCOTUS. That also includes Justices Breyer, Kennedy, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

[Ohioan]

Another analytically dysfunctional Leftist. The Constitution certainly was never intended to overturn the cultural heritage of any of the States; nor was it ever centered around notions of equality--something not found among living species.

Now there is an exception, but that was abandoned by the XVIth Amendment: The provision in Article I, Sec. 9, that any direct tax on the people had to be "per capita"--that is the same exact amount (not percentage) for every individual.

Ms. Ginsburg is either confused or a student of the Pravda/Goebbels school of reporting, where the desired end, always overrides the truth.

William Flax

[Republican Wildcat]

Justice Ginsburg apparently does not understand the concept of language, therefore, could not possibly understand the Constitution, or anything else for that matter. A man cannot be a wife, and a woman cannot be a husband, therefore, same-sex “marriage” does not exist, regardless of whether society is “more accepting” of it or not, as there is no marriage without a husband and a wife. Basic language. “Equality” has nothing to do with it.

By this logic, it shows a lack of “equality” for women being able to get pregnant, but men are not able to do so.