Skip to comments.
The Washington _________
Slate ^
| 08/08/2013
| David Plotz
Posted on 08/08/2013 8:55:24 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: Responsibility2nd
asking, urging, and haranguing the Washington Redskins to ditch their nickname, calling it a racist slur and an insult to Indians Its not a slur if you're proud to be a redskin.
41
posted on
08/08/2013 10:06:25 AM PDT
by
marron
To: sockhead
You are mostly correct - from Wikipedia's Washington Redskins page:
"Initially, the new team took the same name as their landlords, the Boston Braves, one of the two local baseball teams at the time. The Braves played their first game on October 2, 1932, under the leadership of coach Lud Wray, against the Brooklyn Dodgers, to whom they lost 140.[10] The next week, the Braves recorded their first win, beating the New York Giants, 146.[11] Despite the presence of two rookies; halfback Cliff Battles and tackle Glen "Turk" Edwards the new franchise's losses during the first season reached $46,000 and Bendix, O'Brien, and Doyle dropped out of the investment, leaving Marshall the sole owner of the Braves.[12][13] The team moved to Fenway Park[14] (home of the Boston Red Sox) the next year, and Marshall changed the name to the "Redskins" apparently in honor of then-coach Lone Star Dietz,[15] a Native American (he claimed to be part Sioux, but his actual ancestry has been challenged)."
The hidden gem here is that the name was changed to "Redskins" in honor of their then-coach, Lone Star Dietz, who claimed to be Native American.
To: Responsibility2nd
I am terribly offended by this school's mascot and I demand it be replaced with something more appropriate.
There, fixed it.
To: Still Thinking
“Whats next, the Cleveland Native Americans?”
Nah, they were forced to go all PC a few years back and had to change the name to the Cleveland Drunken Indians
44
posted on
08/08/2013 10:29:11 AM PDT
by
dsrtsage
(One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
To: Responsibility2nd
The Washington Redskins shall forever be named so, by me, in all of my 55 years of watching football games.
That predates “the pre-conception gleam in the eye of the daddy of the author of that story.
To: Responsibility2nd
Eff those so-called Indian activists. If they’d had a bigger defense budget, they’d still own this place!
46
posted on
08/08/2013 11:16:39 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks Responsibility2nd.
Why Slate will no longer refer to Washingtons NFL team as the Redskins.
Oh no, this is going to be a hell of a blow to the millions who rely on Slate for sports coverage.
47
posted on
08/08/2013 5:08:00 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
To: Responsibility2nd; SunkenCiv; sockhead; Red Badger
What an idjit the author of that article is. I heard once that back when the team was known as the Boston Redskins, the guy who named them was thinking more of Boston redskin beans than he was of Indians. But that led to so many bad jokes the team management decided they couldn’t put a bean on the helmets for their logo, so they went with an Indian head logo instead.
48
posted on
08/08/2013 7:49:25 PM PDT
by
Berosus
(I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson