Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge

. If the unborn child is living then states do not have jurisdiction to kill them.

______________________________________

Actually the death penalty is a good example of some states having it and other states forgoing it. The states do decide they have jurisdiction to make that decsion


390 posted on 08/03/2013 7:02:11 PM PDT by Chickensoup (200 million unarmed " people killed in the 20th century by Leftist Totalitarian Fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]


To: Chickensoup
Actually the death penalty is a good example of some states having it and other states forgoing it. The states do decide they have jurisdiction to make that decsion

Really, the Death penalty and Abortion, the same thing?

This is insanity.

398 posted on 08/03/2013 7:13:46 PM PDT by ansel12 ( The difference between libertarianism and conservatism is the libertarian liberalism, not economics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

To: Chickensoup

The death penalty would require a trial, where the defendent (the unborn child), could not be deprived of life without due process.

It would also require an arrest, and a successful prosecution of a capitol crime. None of which apply to the unborn child.

So I agree, with you - the death penalty would argue that we ought not kill the unborn child without due process.


405 posted on 08/03/2013 7:24:56 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson