Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chickensoup

The death penalty would require a trial, where the defendent (the unborn child), could not be deprived of life without due process.

It would also require an arrest, and a successful prosecution of a capitol crime. None of which apply to the unborn child.

So I agree, with you - the death penalty would argue that we ought not kill the unborn child without due process.


405 posted on 08/03/2013 7:24:56 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge

The death penalty would require a trial, where the defendent (the unborn child), could not be deprived of life without due process.

It would also require an arrest, and a successful prosecution of a capitol crime. None of which apply to the unborn child.

So I agree, with you - the death penalty would argue that we ought not kill the unborn child without due process
_______________________________

You are word twisting. I am referring to the fact that states have determined they have jurisdiction in cases of death penalty and they certainly have had jurisdiction in cases of abortion. Not a federal matter.


409 posted on 08/03/2013 7:27:34 PM PDT by Chickensoup (200 million unarmed " people killed in the 20th century by Leftist Totalitarian Fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson