HOLDER OPENS ZIMMERMAN SNITCH LINE – Solicits Email Tips in Persecution of Trayvon Shooter

Gateway Pundit ^ | 7-17-2013 | Jim Hoft

[servo1969]

The U.S. Department of Justice on Monday afternoon appealed to civil rights groups and community leaders, nationally and in Sanford, for help investigating whether a federal criminal case might be brought against George Zimmerman for the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, one advocate said.

[windsorknot]

I think I saw GZ watch a show on black holes

I think it was a Biography Channel bio on Eric Holder.

[Triple]

The courts should rule that the DOJ does not have “standing” to sue for civil rights.

And the the principle of double jeopardy is at play also in this case.

[cuban leaf]

“We have found a witch! May we burn her?”
Is she lighter than a duck?

[clamper1797]

How very soviet of him

[kitchen]

This seems like an auspicious time for someone to post a didactic treatise on email spoofing.

[NonValueAdded]

And the Department of Just Us swings into action. Disgusting.

[dfwgator]

[yoe]

A truism: ERIC HOLDER MASQUERADES AS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BUT IN REALITY HE IS A RACE ACTIVIST. OBAMA MASQUERADES AS POTUS WHEN IN FACT HE IS ONLY A COMMUNITY ACTIVIST. Americans under 55 have been educated to be Politically Correct and believing the dictum of Social Justice taught in law schools across the nation is real justice....Social Justice is a far cry from JUSTICE...so it is very easy for the community organizer cum racist and the racial activist to fool a lot of people a lot of the time.

[servo1969]

Bill of attainder

"A bill of attainder (also known as an act of attainder or writ of attainder) is an act of a legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without privilege of a judicial trial. As with attainder resulting from the normal judicial process, the effect of such a bill is to nullify the targeted person’s civil rights, most notably the right to own property (and thus pass it on to heirs), the right to a title of nobility, and, in at least the original usage, the right to life itself. Bills of attainder were used in England between about 1300 and 1800 and resulted in the executions of a number of notable historical figures. However, the use of these bills eventually fell into disfavour due to the obvious potential for abuse and the violation of several legal principles, most importantly separation of powers, the right to due process, and the precept that a law should address a particular form of behavior rather than a specific individual or group. For these reasons, bills of attainder are expressly banned by the United States Constitution as well as the constitutions of all 50 US states."

U.S. usage

Bills of attainder were used through the 18th century in England, and were applied to British colonies as well. One of the motivations for the American Revolution was anger at the injustice of attainder. Although at least one American state used a bill of attainder to confiscate the property of a British loyalist (called Tories) during the war (New York, in the 1779 case of Parker Wickham), American dissatisfaction with British attainder laws motivated their prohibition in the U.S. Constitution ratified in 1789.



Excerpt from Article One, Section 9 of the United States Constitution, prohibiting the passing of bills of attainderThe United States Constitution forbids legislative bills of attainder under Article I, Section 9. The provision forbidding state law bills of attainder, Article I, Section 10, reflects the importance that the framers attached to this issue.

Within the U.S. Constitution, the clauses forbidding attainder laws serve two purposes. First, they reinforced the separation of powers, by forbidding the legislature to perform judicial or executive functions—since the outcome of any such acts of legislature would of necessity take the form of a bill of attainder. Second, they embody the concept of due process, which was partially reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9; Clause 3 is "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed".

The constitution of every State also expressly forbids bills of attainder. For example, Wisconsin's constitution Article I, Section 12 reads:

"No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate."

Contrast this with the subtly more modern variation of the Texas version: Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws: Impairing Obligation of Contracts:

"No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made".

[jiggyboy]

I read somewhere last night that our legal system is now that of 1950’s Russia — first we name a “criminal” and then we collude to decide what crime he has committed.

[MestaMachine]

How long before holder rides the lightning? The man is anathema to America.

Please excuse any double pings.

This is a Black Rage Ping List, (by request,) to cover the aftermath of the GZ trial and archive the incidents. Let me know. And please add "blackrage" to the keywords. Thank you.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise. Thanks.

[jiggyboy]

some good ones along those lines here

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23zimmermanTipLine

[Irenic]

This literally makes me want to throw up. I am queasy...stunning, just stunning.

[onedoug]

“You mean he’s a white black man?”

“No. He’s a black white man.” —Stanley and Livingstone (1939)

[Buckeye McFrog]

Honestly, you think these cretins would have learned their lesson with flag@whitehouse.gov

[jsanders2001]

> The courts should rule that the DOJ does not have “standing” to sue for civil rights.

And the the principle of double jeopardy is at play also in this case.

My thoughts exactly. DOJ can investigate civil infractions but they usually contain criminal elements on the fringe such as RICO or The Sherman AntiTrust Act violations but those cases usually involve large corporate entities with many moving parts / principals. Usually not singular individuals.

This is purely a spectacle put on for the black people and their white guilt sympathizers and a witch hunt. Jarrett is probably whispering “remember its payback time for the rich white devils” into Holder’s ear daily...

[Inwoodian]

Wow! That’s impressive. Were you sitting at the computer hoping I’d make that comment? Talk about a quick rejoinder.

[Conservative_Rob]

What about . . . .

voter.fraud@usdoj.gov

welfare.fraud@usdoj.gov

ss.fraud@usdoj.gov

medicare.fraud@usdoj.gov

illegal.alien@usdoj.gov

tax.cheat@usdoj.gov

irs.abuse@usdoj.gov

epa.abuse@usdoj.gov

Instead of going after ordinary American citizens, maybe you should look into the civil rights abuses in your own house (ya know, the white one).

[Buckeye McFrog]

Probably a bad time to mention that this is the work of Thomas Perez, the Undersecretary in charge of the Civil Rights division, who is about to become your Secretary of Labor thanks to John McCain’s cave on the filibuster yesterday.