Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Day 24 (Week #5) Zimmerman Trial – Final Day – Probably a Verdict before dinner [No, Jury Adjourned]
The Conservative Treehouse ^ | July 12, 2013 | Sundance

Posted on 07/12/2013 4:52:55 AM PDT by Uncle Chip

Today, July 12th, is DAY #24 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.

Yesterday the prosecution provide closing arguments (Summary: http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/states-closing-argument-two-hours-of-raising-doubt).

Today the defense attorney, Mark O’Mara will present his closing argument. Then the prosecution rebuttal.

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: finalday; livezimmermantrial; trayvon; trayvonmartin; verdict; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 3,501-3,504 next last
To: SE Mom

MOM ... presumtion ... “don’t let them let you do that.”


361 posted on 07/12/2013 6:29:30 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Any doodlers today???


362 posted on 07/12/2013 6:29:36 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

Make the state prove to you that he followed after saying okay — because there is none.


363 posted on 07/12/2013 6:30:01 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: sweetiepiezer

Yep, the news of the week would be enough for me to see this to the jury this afternoon and then bolt to South America. That way if the jury acquits, great and if a political prosecution of me worked, I would not be around to become a show prisoner.


364 posted on 07/12/2013 6:30:11 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

At the beginning, some were taking occasional notes. Very attentive.


365 posted on 07/12/2013 6:31:01 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
Would someone tell Kathi the difference between a nod and a shake of the head.

Glad you pointed that out. The first time i read it (skimmed over it) i only noticed the "shook" and not "yes", so i thought the juror was strongly disagreeing with what she was hearing and consequently i felt disheartened by that.

On a related note i have been optimistic about this jury based on the fact that several stated they have a great disliking and distrust of the media. I have to think that is a good sign for Zimmerman.

366 posted on 07/12/2013 6:31:12 AM PDT by Humbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Toespi
WTF TV. jurors seem very attentive

Judging by the relative slowness of posts, as compared to previous days, I would say the folks here are being very attentive also.
367 posted on 07/12/2013 6:31:44 AM PDT by ratzoe (damn, I miss Barbara Olson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: Humbug

Bill Sheaffer:
WestCoast Sr.; I’m actually enjoying reading all of the posts and opinions. I do have several observations of MOM’s approach but most of those are obvious to those who have watched. Different style than BDLR, trying to explain to jurors what they will have to decide and why it’s not proved beyond a reasonable doubt.


368 posted on 07/12/2013 6:31:59 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Was: Hung jury Now: Not guilty - full acquittal

Still, all it takes is one full moonbat.

369 posted on 07/12/2013 6:32:01 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

“...he called her ‘sir’...”

LOL. I heard him say “sir” and laughed!

Then the judge said some something else two other times, to which he replied, “Yes, your honor.”

So, that’s when I thought I must have heard it wrong the first time...even though it really sounded like he called her sir.

I’m glad someone else heard it! lol


370 posted on 07/12/2013 6:32:09 AM PDT by toldyou (Even if the voices aren't real, they have some pretty good ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: ratzoe

For sure, riveting.


371 posted on 07/12/2013 6:32:17 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

BTW, all these exhibits have been introduced as evidence and will adorn the jury room as they reach their decision.


Great.

I’m hopefull the jury will recognize who gave them this, and wonder why the prosecution didn’t provide similar instruction/materials


372 posted on 07/12/2013 6:32:31 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I love MOM’s comment about the lights: the state never showed the lights were on while presenting. They want you to assume.


373 posted on 07/12/2013 6:32:47 AM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: ratzoe

Kathi Belich, WFTV@KBelichWFTV
The defense is taking the state’s evidence second by second and pointing out the gaps. #Zimmermanon9


374 posted on 07/12/2013 6:32:49 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

State didn’t ask Lauer if her lights lighting her address were on that night .. Why not???


375 posted on 07/12/2013 6:32:54 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: maggief

The judge should be absolutely still.


376 posted on 07/12/2013 6:33:17 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Little baby flashlight.” Lol


377 posted on 07/12/2013 6:33:59 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

I was in the middle of writing a post about..what’s the deal about the light and which witness...when MOM came back and said..they didn’t ask anyone.

I should have known all I needed to do was wait and he would put it together.


378 posted on 07/12/2013 6:34:16 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: onyx

9:31

Bill Sheaffer:
WestCoast Sr.; I’m actually enjoying reading all of the posts and opinions. I do have several observations of MOM’s approach but most of those are obvious to those who have watched. Different style than BDLR, trying to explain to jurors what they will have to decide and why it’s not proved beyond a reasonable doubt.


379 posted on 07/12/2013 6:34:22 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather (Yuri Bezmenov (KGB Defector) - "Kick The Communists Out of Your Govt. & Don't Accept Their Goodies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

s the dad Good friends with MOM or just that he knows him as a good attorney,....maybe through the legal system


However he found him, he made a great choice to help his son.


380 posted on 07/12/2013 6:34:28 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 3,501-3,504 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson