Posted on 07/12/2013 4:52:55 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 12th, is DAY #24 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday the prosecution provide closing arguments (Summary: http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/states-closing-argument-two-hours-of-raising-doubt).
Today the defense attorney, Mark OMara will present his closing argument. Then the prosecution rebuttal.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Nice to see you. You are missed!
It was the biggest joke of a “trial” I have ever witnessed in my life. The state didn’t put on any type of case that showed Zimmerman was guilty. The state sounded like they were the defense and the defense sounded like they were the state. 99% of the witnesses ended up collaborating Zimmerman’s story, even the lead detective. The jury should immediately take a straw vote and say they is no need to go through the “evidence”. Zimmerman is innocent. If by some stretch of the imagination he is convicted of anything it will be because the jury was scared to set him free. Cut and dry. End of story. A blind man can see this was an attempted railroad of a good man, starting over a year and a half ago, to appease the race baiters. Aided and abedded by the so-called president of the United States and his puppet Attorney General. Hard to believe this is happening in the United States. A crooked, third-world country is where you see garbage like this, not in the United States of America. But in ObamaLand anything is possible.
You bet they will
And on the other hand if GZ is found Not Guilty even with that information withheld from the jury, then that tells you even further how weak this case was and how diabolical a scheme was in play here by the Martins and their attorneys and the state.
Amen! When I see that kidn of thing makes me think I’m dealing with liberal bigots.
I am kidding when I say the jury needs “male guidanance”.... at least kidding a little. :) But I’d bet you $20 this will be hung jury.
Who gets to keep the dummy?
Good points. I still suspect there was some sort of wanting to rid themselves of neighborhood watch guys.
Let’s just say that those who claim the jurors are idiots because they are women, will probably be ranting about how ‘smart’ the women are, should they come back, very quickly, with a NOT GUILTY finding.
“The bald guy on FNC just wants the audience to think he is better than OMara.
He reminds me of that actor—Michael Chickless?(sp)
‘cept getting out of there is a matter of life and death...I’m betting a lot of people will leave as soon as it goes to the jury.
Right. I loved that movie! ‘More input Stephanie. More input lol
Yes, we are certainly emotional creatures, that doesn’t mean we can’t call BS when we see it. :-)
It could have been from squinting to see Guy's charts --
“not guilty”
Jury pools are chosen at random. There might be 20 people in a pool.
They start with pool x person #1 and proceed to #20. Then they go to pool y if they don't have 6.
The defense threw one guy off when they found out he supported TM on the Internet. There were 2 male alternates and one got excused during the trial.
I've been on JD where the defense looks over the jury pools and decides to plead. There is some art to jury selection.
that is an ambulance chaser stunt.
I hope if the jury did notice, it registered as such.
LOL! Glad you got the joke.
Bkmking your prediction :)
CNN had a shadow jury of 12. They saw EVERYTHING, it was clear it was a referendum on Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.