Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zimmerman Legal Question

Posted on 07/11/2013 5:31:39 PM PDT by Talisker

Okay, so let's say what happened to Zimmerman happened to a cop. The cop was not trying to enforce the law, he was not using professional training to surveil a suspect (I know Zimmerman was, but bear with me here, it's a thought experiment). The only thing the cop was doing was getting jumped, under exactly the same circumstances as Zimmerman was jumped.

It seems to me that the ONLY thing the cop would have to say is that he feared for his life. Right? There would be no inquiry as to whether the cop's head got beat into the pavement enough, or if it hit the grass instead. There would be no discussion about whether the cop was enough of a wimp to have to use his gun. Nothing. The only question would be whether the cop feared for his life – or even if he feared that he was going to suffer bodily injury, or even if he just was physically attacked at all. If so, then the shooting would be deemed justified, end of subject.

Right?

So why ddoesn't the same legal standard apply to a non-cop? In a case of purely self-defense for a cop, subtracting police work, what is left? The right of a human being to defend himself from injury, harm or death, right? How are these actual facts different for a non-cop under the law? What is the justification for using a different standard for basic self-defense, and why can't Zimmerman's lawyer simply say that in an identical situation, a cop would be ruled as using jusitfiable lethal force, therefore as Zimmerman did the same, he is similiarly not guilty.

And please, no cynical comments about "how the world really works." This is a legal question - I'm looking for a legal explanation of exactly why this defense argument wouldn't be allowed by a judge.

In short, why aren't the purely self-defense standards and thresholds equal for both cops and non-cops?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: blackkk; florida; georgezimmerman; law; trayvonmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: null and void

There are Civilians and Military.

Unless they are Military Police, they are Civilians.

The Courts do not command Cops.

The mistake is their trying to distinguish themselves from their employer.


41 posted on 07/11/2013 6:34:14 PM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

YES AND HERE BYE THE BYE ARE some OTHER FACTS. CRUCIAL facts HAVE We NOT HEARD BECAUSE no one but ANN COULTER has been PRESCIENT enough to point them out...LETS SEE WHAT PRINCESS ANN TELLS US NO ONE ELSE HAS BOTHERED RESEARCH.... WHAT WOULD WE DO WITHOUT HER! SEEMS TO ME LIKE.. SHE’S SORT OF WORTH HER WEIGHT IN GOLD... TAKE A GANDER..

There were at least eight burglaries in the 14 months before Zimmerman’s encounter with Martin. Numerous media accounts admit that “most” of these were committed by black males. I’m waiting to hear about a single crime at Twin Lakes that was not committed by a black male.

Just six months before Zimmerman’s encounter with Martin, two men had broken into the home of a neighbor, Olivia Bertalan, while she was alone with her infant son. She had just enough time to call 911 before running upstairs and locking herself in a room. The burglars knew she was home, but proceeded to rob the place anyway, even trying to enter the locked room where she held her crying child.

Bertalan had seen the burglars just before they broke into her house — one at the front door and one at the back. They were young black males. They lived in the Retreat by Twin Lakes.

In another case, a black teenager strode up to Zimmerman’s house and, in broad daylight, stole a bicycle off the front porch. The bike was never recovered.

Weeks before Zimmerman saw Martin, he witnessed another young black male peering into the window of a neighbor’s house. He called the cops, but by the time they arrived, the suspect was gone.

A few days later, another house was burglarized. The thieves made off with jewelry and a new laptop. Roofers working across the street had seen two black teenagers near the house at the time of the robbery. When they spotted one of the teens the next day, they called the police.

This time, the roofers followed the suspect so he wouldn’t get away. The cops arrived and found the stolen laptop in his backpack. This was the same black teenager Zimmerman had seen looking in a neighbor’s window.

The only reason it’s hard to imagine the Zimmerman case with the races reversed is that it’s hard to imagine a white teenager living in a mixed-race, middle-class community, mugging a black homeowner. This is not a problem of society’s reactions, but of the facts.

There is, however, at least one case of a black homeowner fatally shooting a white troublemaker. He was not charged with murder.

In 2006, the ironically named John White was sound asleep at his nice Long Island home when his teenage son woke him to say there was a mob of white kids shouting epithets in front of the house. The family was in no imminent danger. They could have called 911 and remained safely behind locked doors.

But White grabbed a loaded Beretta and headed out to the end of the driveway to confront the mob. A scuffle ensued and White ended up shooting one of the kids in the face, killing him.

White was charged and convicted only of illegal weapons possession — this was New York, after all — and involuntary manslaughter. He was sentenced to 20 months-to-four years in prison, but after serving five months was pardoned by Gov. David Paterson.

With all due compassion for the kid who was killed, the public was overwhelmingly on the father’s side — a fact still evident in Internet postings about the case. The kids were punks menacing a law-abiding homeowner. Even the prosecutor complained only that Paterson hadn’t called the victim’s family first.

The local NAACP had campaigned aggressively on White’s behalf. There were no threats to riot in case of an acquittal.

The centerpiece of White’s self-defense argument was his recollection of his grandfather’s stories about the Ku Klux Klan. George Zimmerman’s memory of young black males committing crimes at Twin Lakes is somewhat more recent.

John White wasn’t jumped, knocked to the ground, repeatedly punched, and his skull knocked against the ground. He wasn’t even touched, though he claimed the white teen was lunging at him. Talk about no reason to “follow,” there was no reason for him to leave the safety of his locked home. White’s son knew the kids by name. They could have waited for the cops.

So, yes, this case probably would be very different if Zimmerman and Martin’s races were reversed. It is only when the victim is black that we must have a show trial, a million-dollar reward paid to the victim’s parents and the threat of r

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ann-coulter/2013/07/11/coulter-column-zimmerman-trial-years-duke-lacrosse-case#ixzz2Yn3k3xJM


42 posted on 07/11/2013 6:37:01 PM PDT by jimsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greysard
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/20/911-calls-paint-picture-of-chaos-after-florida-teen-is-shot/

Dispatcher: "Let me know if he does anything else."
Zimmerman: "These a**holes, they always get away. When you come in go straight to the left ... when you pass the clubhouse ..."
Dispatcher: "Clubhouse?"
Zimmerman: "Go straight in. Oh, s***. He's running ... down towards the other entrance of neighborhood."
Dispatcher: "He's running? Which way is he running?"
Zimmerman: "Down towards the other entrance to the neighborhood."
Dispatcher: "Which entrance is that, that he is running towards?
Zimmerman: "The back entrance."
[inaudible]
Dispatcher: "Are you following him?"
Zimmerman: "Yeah."

43 posted on 07/11/2013 6:37:39 PM PDT by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: null and void
A cop is assumed to have received more training than a civilian.

A cop is expected to know non-lethal means of ending a confrontation, and it is further assumed that in order for him to resort to lethal means he (or she) would have exhausted those means.

A cop will also expect a close investigation of the facts of the case, and that is expected to temper his response.

That’s the theory.

A cop will rightly expect near instantaneous exoneration if he has used the proper verbal formula, "I felt threatened," no matter what the circumstances were or what witnesses sae.

44 posted on 07/11/2013 6:40:18 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's EcThomics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
important point is cops can shoot to wound OR shoot to kill.

I had a training once, and the trainer, an ex-cop, minced no words. Here is the "Coke bottle," and that's where you shoot. Nowhere else. Missed the bottle, failed the exercise. (This is an outline on a human target that surrounds vital organs. You can see examples here.)

He explained that even a mortally wounded man, a dead man walking, can still kill you if he can reach you. Hence the 21-feet rule. It only takes a few seconds for an attacker to cross that distance (go out and measure 21 feet! It's about 1.5 car lengths!) but you need about 2 seconds to release the retention latch, draw, and fire. You may have to fire as soon as the gun clears the holster and is rotated toward the target. You have no time to aim for extremities, and you can't take the risk of missing. If the threat is not severe enough to shoot to kill, don't touch the firearm.

And here we see another rookie mistake of GZ: he failed to maintain situational awareness and allowed an attacker to approach within strike distance.

45 posted on 07/11/2013 6:42:25 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Cops are special


46 posted on 07/11/2013 6:42:49 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

In the state of Washington, a private citizen can use up to deadly force in an attempt to apprehend a felon. Just make sure you first tell them to stop or you will shoot. You can even shoot if they are attempting to flee after a warning. Just make sure they committed a felony before you shoot.


47 posted on 07/11/2013 6:57:51 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange
Dispatcher: "Are you following him?"
Zimmerman: "Yeah."

GZ walked, TM ran. Did TM got tired after 30 yards and stood there, panting, allowing GZ to approach him? GZ reported that he lost sight of TM and was returning to his truck (meaning "minded his own business") when TM approached him from behind and confronted him.

The point here is simple. TM had better mobility, and he had upper hand in everything that preceded the confrontation. He chose the time and the place. GZ only walked back and forth on a sidewalk between the clubhouse and the street.

48 posted on 07/11/2013 6:58:47 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
The only thing the cop was doing was getting jumped, under exactly the same circumstances as Zimmerman was jumped.

That is the nut of the case. Zimmerman 'claims' he was jumped, was pinned to the ground, pummeled with punches with his head hitting concrete, and finally struggled for control of his firearm.

The prosecution contends that Zimmerman, armed with a gun, profiled, stalked, confronted, and shot Travon Martin.

In your 'cop scenario,' it's obviously self defense. In the first (I believe correct) Zimmerman scenario, it is obviously self defense.

In the second (prosecution) scenario, it is at least manslaughter.

49 posted on 07/11/2013 6:59:55 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Civilian — 1. nonsoldier: a citizen who is not a member of the armed forces


50 posted on 07/11/2013 7:00:35 PM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Here is the State of Washington statute on the use of deadly force. Please note the “Legislative recognition” in the notes section.

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.16.040


51 posted on 07/11/2013 7:02:13 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

why don’t you provide more of that transcript, instead of cherry-picking the part in the middle of it?


52 posted on 07/11/2013 7:02:33 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

You have the idea that this is about self defense when it is really about racism.


53 posted on 07/11/2013 7:07:32 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

The cop would’ve shot someone’s dog....


54 posted on 07/11/2013 7:09:03 PM PDT by freebilly (Creepy and the Ass Crackers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)

Cops aren’t armed?


55 posted on 07/11/2013 7:09:22 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression, and the democrats gleefully use them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Cops are Civilians unless they are Military Police.

Cops are not “Armed Forces” (Military)


56 posted on 07/11/2013 7:13:12 PM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: null and void

That is a lie. Not a theory.


57 posted on 07/11/2013 7:42:53 PM PDT by Waywardson (I did not vote for that pro-abortionist candidate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

I’m a cop, and I would have used the same self-defense method as GZ and it would have been a “good shoot.”

It might get sent to the GJ as perfunctory measure, but there would be no True Bill issued on it.

GZ did nothing legally wrong, my colleagues in Sanford did right by not charging him and careers were ruined over it.

I have NEVER had the PA take up a case that I did not arrest a suspect on...


58 posted on 07/11/2013 7:46:35 PM PDT by Molon Labbie (Prep. Now. Live Healthy, take your Shooting Iron daily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Thanks - that is what I was referring to. And from your Supreme court case that you cited - it sounds like some form of that is true in all states (being a Federal case?).


59 posted on 07/11/2013 7:49:04 PM PDT by 21twelve ("We've got the guns, and we got the numbers" adapted and revised from Jim M.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Molon Labbie

You never had eric holder ordering your PA around, probably. The thing in Sanford is that the mayor was complicit in this kangaroo process from the minute holder phoned to tell them to make this a national spectacle. Even if George is acquitted and no major black panther violence ensues, the message the Obama thuggery wanted to convey has been delivered, that even if you have a lawful concealed carry you will be destroyed if you use the weapon for self defense. ... we are living under a thugocracy and black people are being heavily exploited to keep the pot stirred while the criminal transformations are put in place.


60 posted on 07/11/2013 7:55:53 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson