It appears to be "harassment".
Suppose he said no??
It’s not a mistake. There is a Florida case that indicates the Judge should inquire to make sure that it is the defendants decision. The case doesn’t mandate it but it says they should do it.
Nope. It was CYA to remove a possible grounds for appeal; i.e. that GZ did not understand his rights. Now, her demeanor in dealing with the attorneys and the asking before conclusion of defense is another matter. But, the question per se was correct
That was a flagrant violation of the fifth amendment. Over the objections of his attorney she forced him to testify under oath. I’ve never seen that happen before.