Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick
I think her forcing him to say it was his decision and his alone was a BIG mistake.

It appears to be "harassment".

Suppose he said no??

35 posted on 07/11/2013 5:34:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

It’s not a mistake. There is a Florida case that indicates the Judge should inquire to make sure that it is the defendants decision. The case doesn’t mandate it but it says they should do it.


38 posted on 07/11/2013 5:36:23 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
I think her forcing him to say it was his decision and his alone was a BIG mistake.

Nope. It was CYA to remove a possible grounds for appeal; i.e. that GZ did not understand his rights. Now, her demeanor in dealing with the attorneys and the asking before conclusion of defense is another matter. But, the question per se was correct

44 posted on 07/11/2013 5:40:15 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

That was a flagrant violation of the fifth amendment. Over the objections of his attorney she forced him to testify under oath. I’ve never seen that happen before.


128 posted on 07/11/2013 6:19:06 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson