I’m assuming you’re projecting what violence I might have inflicted on the family I mistakenly saw when I entered their home . . . and they were as startled as me.
I was sixteen.
Had Zimmerman stayed put and waited for the cops, he would not have had suffered anything. Wrong or not . . . the kid he killed would still be alive.
I honestly believe you have not truly followed the FACTS of this case. You are parroting such idiotic LIV points it is really insulting to those of us who have watched, listened and learned.
How about you take your ‘experience’ and go sell it to the twitter crowd who are salivating over the same lame argument you keep trying to push here.
I am not “projecting violence”.
I am recounting Trayvon Martins physical assault on George Zimmerman.
Had Martin merely talked to Zimmerman rather than attacking him nothing would have happened other than Trayvon and his Dad being evicted from the condos for mot being on the lease when the police arrived.
Trayvon made it home, but then went back afte Zimmerman. We know this from the prosecution’s witness Racheal Jeantel. Had he stayed home and watched TV whilst eating skittles he would still be on. He chose to seek the short fat guy out and got his thug on.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
“Had Zimmerman stayed put and waited for the cops, he would not have had suffered anything. Wrong or not . . . the kid he killed would still be alive.”
...and still breaking into houses, fighting, stealing, and eventually (statistically) working his way up to killing someone with the gun he already had and was playing with (see judge-suppressed photos).
If Martin had gone home and stayed home, rather than coming back and beating the crap out of a neighborhood watch volunteer (who was just keeping an eye on something suspicious), he’d be alive.
The self-defense law in florida (not stand your ground BUT self defense) is very specific. If at some point you reasonably believe you are in danger of being killed or done seriously bodily harm in an altercation, you have the legal right to defend yourself by the necessary means to keep yourself from being killed or seriously injured.
What happened BEFORE that moment is NOT the basis for a guilty verdict. The cops said this, you did that, your vehicle was here, you got out and walked there, etc. has nothing to do with a just verdict under the florida law of self defense.
To argue - if that’s what you’re doing here and I can’t tell for sure if you’re just venting from your past experience or if you are truly trying to argue points of law - that because of what Z did or didn’t do prior to the moment the self-defense law kicked in, that the self-defense law should be ignored in favor of a guilty verdict is not smart, and is wrong.
You can keep going there, can’t stop you, but the law is the law and no matter how many times you go there, it will remain the law under which they are duty bound to render this verdict.
Z broke no law and we are a country governed by law, not mob rule or emotion. If TM had not tried to kill Z, he would still be alive.
He was walking back to his car to meet the police.... are you paying attention?
>> Wrong or not . . . the kid he killed would still be alive.
Yeah, then St. Trayvon could still fight and steal and smoke dope and buy guns and maybe the next time he run inta a cracka de cracka be dead. Or maybe it be an innocent cracka’s ten month old baby in a burglary dead.
All Zimmerman’s fault.