Posted on 07/09/2013 4:51:37 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 9th, is DAY #21 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday was the first full day of defense witnesses. Perhaps the most significant of the first set were the two police officers who stated Tracy Martin, Trayvon’s father, said on 2/28/12 the cries for help on the 911 calls were NOT Trayvon. Later in the day Tracy Martin took the stand and essentially said the two detectives were lying. A great analysis of the events from yesterday is available HERE.
What additionally strikes as important to us is the first signs of desperation from the original nucleus of the Scheme Team construct, Benjamin Crump and Daryl Parks – attorneys for the Martin family. Parks appeared on Piers Morgan show last night and the video should be watched by anyone who knows how the scheme was constructed.
We accept that Mark O’Mara is conflicted in this case, and he is trying to walk a fine line between presenting a defense to a case built on political pressure and outright fraud; Yet simultaneously avoiding exposition of both the politics and the fraud itself.
The intentionally avoided open doors exposing the fraud creates anxiety for those of us who know what is inside the room he is avoiding. Our prayers are that his passing those wide open doors is based on prudence [within an unknown strategy]. However, our fear is the hasty and politically correct avoidance might cause him to pass by the room holding the key to George Zimmerman’s ultimate ‘long-term’ freedom.
It should be noted the NAACP Annual National Convention starts in Orlando on Friday; Additionally, preparations are being made in/around Miami-Dade for a Wednesday defense wrap up with a community/LEO preparation meeting today.
(Excerpt) Read more at wftv.com ...
Text message deletions demonstrated patterns: Certain people, certain topics (e.g. drugs and guns). Pornography was not deleted.
darn it
Porn on the phone.
can’t isolate the date of deletion but all messages that were deleted had to do with fighting or guns. messages about porn were left on so it wasn’t like TM deleted ‘inappropriate’ things; someone deleted things that would incriminate TM
I believe I have heard of it. But it does nothing for my garden compared to good ole fashioned RAIN....and the sprinkler does not keep the leaves from crisping from the heat. You’re obviously not a gardener/plant person.
My interpretation of how he answered that question is that ***I** can’t tell you when they were deleted but that information can be obtained
Thanks so much...I have not seen this until now!
Mantei did not put on much of a cross exam.
So....if this gets admitted, I guess MOM has not called his last witness?
Best explanation yet of her testimony. Thank you.
think that thru...ap and code and hidden ai’nt cop smart stuff but is state resources stuff
Geez, I’m wondering why the date can’t be determined? Perhaps it’s time to subpoena the NSA.
there’s more
i forgot the link
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/Trayvon-Martin-evidence-photos-679832
And the porn has to be brought into evidence to prove who it was that deleted the other messages! lol!
The super secret android app had two different folders. At least one of the file folders had a French name. The app also changed photo .jpg extensions into .bin extensions.
DD mentioned texting him. Wouldn’t that open the door ?
Crump?
he said 2 things....I has an opinion who did it and he knows when but can not say
no, maybe he meant NSA or someone higher up than him
Rachael Jeantel was obviously trayvons techy.
Had to be someone in LE.
**********************************
Or someone on the State’s or prosecutor’s team who had temporary access to the phone while having it examined by their “experts”.
I would be interested in knowing the metadata date/time stamp of the most recent of the deleted items.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.