To: GIdget2004
When is this idiot up for re-election?
2 posted on
07/05/2013 10:18:32 AM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: GIdget2004
Is a legislative over-ride possible or likely?
4 posted on
07/05/2013 10:22:14 AM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: GIdget2004
6 posted on
07/05/2013 10:23:12 AM PDT by
mongo141
(Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
To: GIdget2004
What else would one expect when a red state elects a Democrat to statewide office? I guess people really are that dumb...
7 posted on
07/05/2013 10:26:38 AM PDT by
Hurricane Andrew
(There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think.)
To: GIdget2004
I suspect Nixon was right - doesn’t seem like the state would have jurisdiction over federal officials, nor that state law could override federal law. He could have let it ride and spent the money on court cases though, to prove it.
10 posted on
07/05/2013 11:01:12 AM PDT by
Glenmore
To: GIdget2004
It’s likely that there is a ton of legal precedent to enforce Fed regs over states.
11 posted on
07/05/2013 11:04:06 AM PDT by
lurk
To: GIdget2004
Nixon’s a Rat...it would appear.He takes his orders from Osama Obama & Pals.
12 posted on
07/05/2013 11:05:57 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
To: GIdget2004
Can he be overridden? What exactly are “federal free speech rights?”
13 posted on
07/05/2013 11:07:12 AM PDT by
pallis
To: GIdget2004
Federal law is supreme only in those areas authorized by the Constitution. State law is supreme in everything else. See the 10th Amendment.
15 posted on
07/05/2013 11:26:35 AM PDT by
JoeFromSidney
( New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Buy from Amazon.)
To: GIdget2004
He noted that the U.S. Constitution generally gives supremacy to federal laws over conflicting state ones. Illiteracy should be a disqualifier for office.
To: GIdget2004
It was his administration that illegally turned over the list of Missouri CCW license holders to the feds, then lied about it.
18 posted on
07/05/2013 12:12:58 PM PDT by
fungoking
(Tis a pleasure to live in the Ozarks)
To: GIdget2004
How is not publishing the names of gun owners a violation of free speech? Gun ownership is a right and your choice not to have the information make public is/should also be your right. The public has no need to know that.
19 posted on
07/05/2013 12:20:17 PM PDT by
beelzepug
(if any alphabets are watchin', I'll be coming home right after the meetin')
To: GIdget2004
When the said federal laws are unconstitutional and thus unlawful the state has every right to protect its citizens.
20 posted on
07/05/2013 12:36:07 PM PDT by
DeWalt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson