Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/05/2013 10:15:21 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GIdget2004

When is this idiot up for re-election?


2 posted on 07/05/2013 10:18:32 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Is a legislative over-ride possible or likely?


4 posted on 07/05/2013 10:22:14 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Another RAT at work.


6 posted on 07/05/2013 10:23:12 AM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

What else would one expect when a red state elects a Democrat to statewide office? I guess people really are that dumb...


7 posted on 07/05/2013 10:26:38 AM PDT by Hurricane Andrew (There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

I suspect Nixon was right - doesn’t seem like the state would have jurisdiction over federal officials, nor that state law could override federal law. He could have let it ride and spent the money on court cases though, to prove it.


10 posted on 07/05/2013 11:01:12 AM PDT by Glenmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

It’s likely that there is a ton of legal precedent to enforce Fed regs over states.


11 posted on 07/05/2013 11:04:06 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
Nixon’s a Rat...it would appear.He takes his orders from Osama Obama & Pals.
12 posted on 07/05/2013 11:05:57 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Can he be overridden? What exactly are “federal free speech rights?”


13 posted on 07/05/2013 11:07:12 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
Federal law is supreme only in those areas authorized by the Constitution. State law is supreme in everything else. See the 10th Amendment.
15 posted on 07/05/2013 11:26:35 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney ( New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Buy from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
He noted that the U.S. Constitution generally gives supremacy to federal laws over conflicting state ones.

Illiteracy should be a disqualifier for office.

16 posted on 07/05/2013 11:35:28 AM PDT by Brass Lamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

It was his administration that illegally turned over the list of Missouri CCW license holders to the feds, then lied about it.


18 posted on 07/05/2013 12:12:58 PM PDT by fungoking (Tis a pleasure to live in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

How is not publishing the names of gun owners a violation of free speech? Gun ownership is a right and your choice not to have the information make public is/should also be your right. The public has no need to know that.


19 posted on 07/05/2013 12:20:17 PM PDT by beelzepug (if any alphabets are watchin', I'll be coming home right after the meetin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

When the said federal laws are unconstitutional and thus unlawful the state has every right to protect its citizens.


20 posted on 07/05/2013 12:36:07 PM PDT by DeWalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson