Posted on 07/01/2013 5:17:35 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 1st, is DAY #16 (of 4th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Last week the prosecution feebly presented the first series of witnesses against George Zimmerman. However, as most observers would note, the witnesses called by the state have so far been more beneficial for the Zimmerman Self-Defense position.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
All the racist black so-called leaders got together and decided this was going to be another historical case to support their race agenda...Even Obama inserted himself into this...
They were going to find him guilty and hang Zimmerman in the town square to show everyone how racism is rampant in America.
Its totally backfiring on them...Zimmerman is 100 percent credible, all based on evidence...
The prosecution has nothing here.
This has blown up in the government/prosecution faces..
Right Fawn. When you said that it would benefit GZ to go to jail for a few years as he would be safe, I made my comment to you.
I stand by it. Completely idiotic.
Seen it, thanks don
This testimony and GZs voice and words are devastating to the prosecution. Cannot believe they are playing this.
My idea of a perfect outcome of this trial would be for the chief of police to formally return Zimmerman’s gun with a commendation award for a job well done.
You’re quite right...If Rachel was hamming it up...making like being dim....it sure would take away the judges “sympathy card”.
The judge could have avoided the conflict between the two rules, by simply telling the prosecution to put the parents testimony first in the line up.
...and the fact he’s just matter of factly talking freely and drawing diagrams...in My Opinion adds to his truthfullness.
Most of the inconsistencies are the result of ambiguous questioning. Some may be the result of faulty memory on Zimmerman's part.
I take it as being neutral.
You bet EM... They are playing it as they have nothing else..Each witnesses seems to totally support Zimmerman.
Wouldn't that ruling go out the window if the prosecution or a prosecution witness makes the mistake of saying anything at all about St. Skittle's character?
Days later, she’s adversarial toward him, because his various recountings and recreations don’t line up exactly.
Absolutely...They’ll go after meaningless details...
They’ve already severed the meat...
They have nothing else...
One camera wasn’t working, power cord cut by a lawn mower the week before or something like that, and the video from one was basically black with one white dot from a streetlight for ten minutes.
My grandson’s voice just changed. Sounds just like his father’s....so of course I say Hi Holmes. And he says no grandma this is Watson.
Obviously you have experience in this regard. But is there anything at all that would cause you to see that she “is” speaking to him as more of a “peer” and not a “suspect”?
She sounds to me, as if she is gathering facts from a fellow law enforcer to sustain that this act was self-defense.
BTW, when you ask the same questions over and over, even a normal honest person version of event details will change.
I can’t wait to hear how the Talking Torsos spin this one.
Ever been interviewed by the cops...First time out is very neutral...they’re looking for bits of “memory”. Then depending on what they hear/perceive...the next interview and the next and the next change.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.