Posted on 06/29/2013 11:06:42 AM PDT by blueyon
"THE ZIMMERMAN PROSECUTION HAS A GIANT PROBLEM (see red text below) George Zimmerman re-enactment video with the police BEFORE he had a lawyer and right after the shooting": [I WILL BE IN FLORIDA on MONDAY in COURTROOM. OTR at 10pm will air live from Florida Monday night.]
First, as it stands now, (and ONLY my guess and it is early and much can change) do not expect George Zimmerman to take the witness stand (although he has a Constitutional right to do so if he wants to do so.)
This re-enactment video will help you understand the scene of the shooting according to George Zimmerman and is in his words. It is also a horrible video for the prosecution.
(Excerpt) Read more at gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com ...
Martins civil was not the second bite by government.
Indeed.
Duh...I’m just now getting it. Libs afraid if Z is found to be innocent, then it will go far in showing that concealed carry laws do protect us from villains like Martin. Z would be dead if he had not had a gun.
I am saying it is not s drop dead certainty that it happened the way GZ said it did.
So, let me understand this, if I disagree with you, then you feel it is acceptible to cuss at me and accuse me of bring a troll? You do not want to hear both sides of the story. Plus you all by your self presume to have the authority to expel yourself from this forum? You think very highly of yourself, don’t you?
Fair enough.
It wasn’t like gz was defending against a home invasion. He was on a street whose name he did not know. Just because a person is a man does not mean you have to confront everyone in your neighborhood who you do not know. Now we know tm was walking back from a 7/11. He did not need to be confronted.
Are you kidding me? You do not believe in innocent until proven guilty? Why do think that is one of our basics in our justice system? For situations just like this.
It could have been taking a leak by the power pole? wtf?
No, he didn't "need to be," but if someone whose practice historically is to keep an eye on the area wants to ask why they are there, what's wrong with that? And it was not public property.
If GZ said, "can I help you find something?" is that "confrontation?" I ask people this all the time when I don't understand why someone is on my residential street and they seem to hanging around inspecting the houses in my neighborhood. It's called "good citizenship."
Where are you getting your info that TM was walking on a sidewalk? Cite your source.
I agree with what you say, I just think it will be a lot harder for the feds to try Zimmerman the way they did with the LA cops. The case could make them look stupid. Feds really hate to look stupid. That doesn’t mean they can’t make life hell for Zimmerman, they can. But he should win in the end, especially with a federal jury. The feds might try to get a plea to a far lower offense and use their coercive power to get Zimmerman to give in. But I don’t see how they do any better than the state on the facts. As I said, you have an innocent man here, not a case that could go either way.
But if GZ's description reasonably could be true, then GZ is before the law, innocent. End of case.
Good thought.
I'm now wondering if anybody from that hood is missing a coupl'a bicycle rims, and might recognize them in court as well...
Yes, I do think very highly of myself. I am great, hence my name.
There are at least a couple of sources saying that “ass-cracker” has been slang for homosexual for quite some time in certain “cultures”. Click here if you dare for three entries, two of them dated 2003:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ass+cracker
You’re banging your head against a curb with some of these people. Some posters, for reasons unknown to me, will spin elaborate yarns based on MSM lies to reach their conclusions about this case, and will trumpet those thoughts over and over. When hard facts are presented to them, they ignore those facts and just keep doing it.
That was a very big deal. One more “prosecution” witness that helped the defense. You didn’t hear much about that on any Old Media daily trial wrap-up as it laid bare their misinformation campaign.
The L.A. cops in the Rodney King situation not only had evidence of abuse (although they were swinging the clubs to break bone - leg and arm - because their previous training to put it across the neck resulted in a death), but cops using racial pejoritives, not taking King to the hospital for a substantial period of time, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.