Posted on 06/28/2013 5:14:39 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, June 28th, is DAY #15 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. [Yesterday] … it was simply not a very good day at all for the prosecution. The primary State witnesses today were Rachel Jeantel, Jenna Lauer, and Selma Mora.
The first had her credibility substantively destroyed, the second was powerfully–almost humiliatingly–co-opted by the defense, and the third provided testimony entirely consistent with the defense’s theory of lawful self-defense. (continue reading)
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
I suspect that before the state rests its case we will see Zimmerman’s kindergarten teacher on the stand.
not having one ready to go would be foolish....imagine pulling out your gun when you need it and asking for time out to load...liberalism is truly a mental disorder
LOL! I think you're right. I can't believe how many of these "State" witnesses are testifying for the Defense.
Soooooooooooo - all police officers are either “grossly negligence” or “intent” on murdering anyone they come into contact with.
Good to know.
Kinda like getting in the car in the driveway, ready for a nice vacation drive and being okay with an empty gas tank.
The legal commentator on the local FL CBS channel said this afternoon that after all the evidence has been presented and one party or the other doesn’t think the case has been made, they can put in a lesser charge for the jury to consider.
Personally, when he was talking about that it made my blood run cold because a lesser charge, i.e., manslaughter, could give GZ many years in jail and might seem a ‘split the difference’ verdict to the jurors who would be inclined to acquit if the only option is Murder2.
Joe Manolo testimony doesn’t match Zimmerman’s walkthrough video
It sounds like next week the state will be presenting their case for manslaughter
For awhile the Chump and company thought DD was T s sixteen year old girl friend. They no doubt had even read some of the hot e text messages
Would love to observe their faces when they first saw her
I had to turn FOX off...some idiot said that GZ definitely stalked and killed TM because he was black teenager.
That’s why I have not watched cable news for years...just thought I’d try it tonight. Won’t do it anymore. My B/P is high enough!
I had to turn FOX off...some idiot said that GZ definitely stalked and killed TM because he was black teenager.<<
A better theory is:
GZ saw TM doing suspicious activity, walking next to houses rather than on sidewalk because of the rain. GZ called this in to Police and they were en route. He continued to watch the suspicious activity by following TM at some kind of distance, but not much. Rachel was on phone and TM was giving locations. She was also giving stupid commentary. TM made it home and GZ lost him and went back to his truck. For some reason, TM went to confront GZ a fight ensued and GZ shot TM. TM died on the scene.
Why would TM go back to confront GZ if he was home free? And I believe Rachel even if her presentation was awful. She told enough of the truth to see the scene. I don’t think ten years of coaching would have given her enough practice to lie effectively, not ignorance though...ego. Rachel told TM that she though that guy following TM was a sexual predator. The implication would be that he wanted TM for that purpose. That could make a young man with a violence problem go back and try to beat on the “sexual predator”.
This also does not sell well in the media as you would have a hate crime...the beating of GZ because of perceived sexual orientation, vs. the death of a black youth to gun violence by someone not favored by media status.
This theory fits the facts of all the witnesses I’m aware of, and answers the stupid questions. It is also consistent with young behavior.
I cannot get inside TM’s head, so this will only be a theory and I think it fits the facts better and with more explanation of all the parties behaviors better than the ones I’ve heard.
What do you think?
DK
I wonder... after TM made it back to dad’s house it was DD who egged TM to go back and kick that crazy ass cracker’s ass. Those were her words not his. That is why DD couldn’t face his mom and cried on the stand.
and the ‘get off - get off’ was TM telling DD to hang up the phone.
Just kicking a crazy...cracker might not be enough, but if he thought the guy was interested in him for sex...that would explain so much. And Rachel would feel extremely responsible because she may believe it was her that egged TM back to GZ.
I think it was a hate crime. TM on GZ. I don’t like hate crimes but perceived sexual orientation is usually one of them.
Thanks for the feedback.
DK
It’s ALL sad man
That was Barbara Billingsley (sp?), Beaver and Wally’s mom on the TV series Leave It To Beaver.
Very good theory, DK! It could very well have happened that way!
I cannot get inside TM’s head, so this will only be a theory and I think it fits the facts better and with more explanation of all the parties behaviors better than the ones I’ve heard.
What do you think?
Sounds plausible to me. Too much machismo at a young age causes many to do stupid things. In this case its not out of line to think that TM payed the ultimate price for just that.
According to a talking head on MSNBC today she’s a genius, speaking 3 languages by age 5 - no one knows what those languages ARE!, but she is evidently fluent.
Jive, Hip Hop, and Ebonics..... :):)
All delivered in a mumbling manner to demonstrate her mastery...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.