Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/27/2013 11:20:17 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

In this political climate, where there is no Republican will to take on ANY difficult issues ... this will not happen.


2 posted on 06/27/2013 11:22:41 AM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

Won’t matter. The SCOTUS would declare the Constitution “unconstitutional”.

It’s time to tell them to shove it.


3 posted on 06/27/2013 11:24:14 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

Never happen.


5 posted on 06/27/2013 11:25:15 AM PDT by boomop1 (term limits will only save this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

Good to hear. 37 states have already signed their own DOMA and that’s just enough to ratify an amendment.

And if Congress won’t propose the amendment, then 34 of statehouses can propose it per the US Constitution.


6 posted on 06/27/2013 11:25:54 AM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

A Con-Con would be really scary stuff. Every nutball and activist would glom onto it like Silly Putty. We’d end up with amendments for a “right” to health care, a “right” to free college, a “right” to two weeks paid vacation, etc.


8 posted on 06/27/2013 11:30:21 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN; All

Corrupt Congress should have proposed an amendment to the Constitution which defines marriage as a one man, one woman union instead of making constitutionally questionable federal DOMA law in first place. (But thank God that they didn’t since words like man and woman have no meaning anymore.)

But frankly, given the country is divided in all issues, essentially a war between good and evil, the Constitution is essentially unamendable at this time, the Article V 3/4 state supermajority required to ratify a proposed amendment nowhere to be found at this time imo. So is Rep. Tim Huelskamp just politicking?


9 posted on 06/27/2013 11:31:47 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

If that’s what we gotta do, that’s what we do


11 posted on 06/27/2013 11:35:20 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

Isn’t the amendment route what the people in California tried only to have a homosexual judge decide it was unconstitutional to change the constitution? Once the people no longer rule, that cannot rule themselves back into power.


14 posted on 06/27/2013 11:39:40 AM PDT by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN
Someone(s) does need to tell someone(s) to shove it. These homos win this and the Church will have to go underground or marry these homos and allow them to preach from the pulpit. I would rather see the Church close their door and go underground.
16 posted on 06/27/2013 11:42:45 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN
Been saying a Constitutional amendment is the only way to fix this problem since Justice Kennedy declared butt-sex a God-given right in 2005.

Let's get on with it. I'm 100% on board.
26 posted on 06/27/2013 12:37:03 PM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

The most recent Constitutional Amendment adopted that was submitted to the states took over 200 years. There is no time limit here like the gloomy crowd who think in short time frames.


30 posted on 06/27/2013 1:04:32 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson