Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

A Con-Con would be really scary stuff. Every nutball and activist would glom onto it like Silly Putty. We’d end up with amendments for a “right” to health care, a “right” to free college, a “right” to two weeks paid vacation, etc.


8 posted on 06/27/2013 11:30:21 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog

Oh I agree. No way do we want a constitutional convention because that opens up everything. But there is a process in the current constitution for amendments. And we have enough states on board to do it.


10 posted on 06/27/2013 11:31:56 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

There might be such amendments but they would never be ratified by 37 states.

Right now 37 states have already signed into state law a version of DOMA.

Republicans and conservatives control the vast majority of statehouses. In fact the 2010 Tea Party tsunami was more devastating to liberals at the statehouse level than at the federal level.

A CC would quickly pare the nonsensical amendments out of the process.

The liberals can’t win in fly-over country unless they can convince conservatives to stop thinking about a CC because a CC would bring all sorts of BS amendments.....Oh Wait!


13 posted on 06/27/2013 11:36:49 AM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The task of keeping a convention’s agenda under control is in the hands of the Chairman.


25 posted on 06/27/2013 12:32:01 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson