Posted on 06/18/2013 5:51:17 PM PDT by workerbee
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago.
However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down.
Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded and crashed off the coast of nearby East Moriches, Long Island, killing everyone on the plane.
“..This team of investigators who actually handled the wreckage and victims’ bodies, prove that the officially proposed fuel-air explosion did not cause the crash,” reads a statement by the producers of the film, which will debut on cable network EPIX next month. “They also provide radar and forensic evidence proving that one or more ordinance explosions outside the aircraft caused the crash.” However, the statement said they did not speculate about the source or sources of any ordinance explosions.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I still wonder if this is what that sneaky scumbag thief Sandy Berger was stuffing down his pants.
Yeah. And that plane that went down near Pittsburgh on 9-11 wasn’t shot down either.
I recall quite well being scolded for even suggesting that dozens of service people must know if there were missiles being launched that night. The scolders kept repeating that it could not have been a missile because it is impossible to keep that many witnesses from speaking up. Of course, civilian witnesses who saw even one who videoed the thing said something flashed up from the surface then the plane exploded. But the fithful government collected all those stories and promptly deep sixed them, as well as the video the guy took from the dock where he had a boat party going on.
It is more likely that Sandy the burglar was stuffing proof of little barry’s ineligibility down his pants. But the Clintons were told not ot use that material and barry would be the next pResident.
Yes, but not of those particular explosives. We had a chemical residue trail analyspzed as rocket fuel residue on the backs of specific seats. . And yes, strange round shrapnel recovered from multiple bodies that is a signature of certain anti-aircraft missiles. . But they were covered up. There was overwhelming evidence that a missile struck that plane. The math did not permit the time required for the "zoom climb" scenarios of either the CIA or the NTSB cartoons. (see Swordmaker's detailed timelines — do a search of FR for it) The only scenario that fits with the location of the debris fields (including the anomalous debris field 90° away from the vector of flight) is the strike of a missile and a ballistic fall without power of both the nose and main body of the plane . . . and the debris ejected by the missile transecting the plane and carrying parts with it that landed in the anomalous 90° field. Ten there is the Mach to radar track that intersected the plane . . .
I read or heard that right after the twa explosion that the Toon signed an executive order prohibiting whistle blower protection for Navy Seals...who were the ones searching for debris in the ocean....
I think the Clintons have had the goods on the African communist all along. They just couldn't find a clean way to make it work while making sure they could never be named as sources. I believe their problem was that the Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms refused to help them - - those newsroom scum wanted the African communist way too much to do anything to get in the way.
It should never be forgotten that it was the Clintons who gave birth to the "birther" movement.
During the first Obama presidential campaign, in August, 2008, Bill Clinton was asked by ABC News if he thought Obama was qualified to be president. Clinton knew what was meant by the question but instead of commenting about Obama's character, experience, knowledge of foreign and domestic policy, and leadership abilities, etc., he offered this rather cryptic reply:
"The constitution sets qualification for the president. And then the people decide who they think would be the better president."
"The constitution sets qualification for the president"? That's his answer?? Bill Clinton made this reference to the Constitution shortly after America's latest fad, the "community organizer" from Chicago, popped up out of nowhere to steal his wife's destiny by winning - - in rather sleazy fashion (including the shameless playing of "the race card") - - the Democrat party's nomination for President.
It has been my opinion since that time that the Clintons know something, and that it was they who quite deliberately fanned the flames of controversy over Obama's birth. Remember, it was Philadelphia lawyer Philip Berg, a prominent campaign-fund bundler for Hillary Clinton, who launched *the first* Obama eligibility lawsuit. That lawsuit was filed in August of 2008, shortly after Bill Clinton made his curious reference to the Constitution when asked if he thought Obama was qualified to be President. Coincidental timing? Sure it was.
But the Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms never vetted Obama And why would they? Everything anybody wanted to know about Obama they could read in his two autobiographies, right? So... what's to vet? Despite the forged documents, the white-washed personal history, and even some old Obama campaign literature that claimed Barry was born in Kenya, the Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms were happy to simply take the word of their African communist candidate - - on everything.
Meanwhile...
Associated Press Devotes 11 Reporters to "Fact Check" Sarah Palin Book
That theory was raised, but it doesn't survive the triangulation of the witnesses viewpoints. A bolide would only appear to rise, coming over the horizon from a single vector, not from the 270° degrees around that the witnesses observing the incident were located. The bolide hypothesis, is, ahem, shot down.
That would have been me, amount others, along with some dis-information artists toeing the administration's talking point line. . . Taking the counter point.
Now, if we can get admissions regarding Oklahoma City, and the terrorist attack on the Murrah Bldg ...
And this one is to the physics of the ZOOM CLIMB impossibility thread: Zoom Climb Thread
most of us have studied hard, worked hard, did all the "right" things, like our parents and grandparents before us...the forces of success are just against us...
Generally a safe bet. It's when they tell the truth that gives me the willies!
Dear Leader doesn't want to do the time for negligent mohamicide.
Don't forget they were busy pumping the "domestic terrorist" meme, to the exclusion of Muslims, (sound familiar?).
Much of current policy is an extrapolation/extension of Clinton policy, and aside from the 'hope and change shuffle', the song and dance is the same.
I believe Al Gore oversaw the investigation and report.
Did any terrorist group claim responsibility?
IIRC, the debris field also indicated a missile.
Bump for the morning crowd. Interesting thread. Interesting timing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.