Posted on 06/13/2013 10:24:41 AM PDT by plewis1250
Sarah Palin rejoining FOXNEWS as contributor, DRUDGE has learned, announcement expected this afternoon... Developing...
Thanks dForest.
I guess these folks don’t realize PDS can be accurate in reverse too.
FOX bought the lie that Palin was a washed up has-been.
Now they’ve realised what a huge following she has.
She brings in the viewers! They probably had to ante-up a sweetened contract to get her back!!
I’m happy to see it.
Pds knows o bounds, he expects sarah to solve illegal immigration while not running at this point, and thus paint her wrongfully as ot being against it......lame pds tactics at best, but, when think you’re some sort 0f towering political intellectual like he feels.....hey, he can say what he wants
“....We stand the threat of having 100 million third worlders being moved into this nation,...”
...who will vote reliably democrat for the next several generations, thereby guaranteeing one-party rule, draining the social welfare system, and disenfranchising the rest of us.
As for Sarah...I hope she does run for the Arizona Senate seat so we can be rid of Juan McCain.
Let pds d-boy have his fun.....it makes him feel like he way aheadof all us lowly ‘uniformed’ Sarah fans.....
I hate to say this, and I’m not trying to be as anti-Palin as folks think, but I am VERY anti-policy on certain points.
Immigration is one of them.
If she were in the Senate right now, she would be voting for this immigration bill.
I cannot back someone who doesn’t know better than that.
We go after Rubio tooth and nail, but he isn’t advocating anything that Sarah isn’t.
The facts are that McCain was not going to lose his seat, and that you are some kind of obsessive guy who REALLY doesn’t want Palin on Fox news and who is not interested in Senator Cruz or the only Senate seat pick up in 2012 or the historical conservative victory of 2010.
Here is a 3 year old post, you won’t get it but others might.
To:*****
““I think it makes perfect sense, and not from a stance of political loyalty, either. In short, in this age of “gotcha” journalism, Sarah cannot say in 2008 that McCain is good enough to be President, but that he isn’t good enough to be Senator in 2010; which would be the meme if she declined to campaign for him. All it would do if she declined to campaign for McCain or outright spoke against him is make political hay for the left””
I think that the 2008 Republican VP not supporting the Presidential candidate in his reelection to his Senate seat would make the entire Republican race of 2008 look like a failed sham that the GOP was trying to pull over the public’s eyes, and I think that it would have halted the momentum that conservatives have built in recent months.
I believe that the general public would view Palin as shallow, unstable, and threatening, and also see the entire Republican brand in the same way, like they are in disarray and broken and most importantly, unstable and not ready to lead. Obama and the Democrats would be seen as the more stable and their win of 2008 would be perceived as the nation dodging a bullet that did not become known to the general public until Palin turned on the man that 60 million Americans voted for, for President.
I think that Palin has the reasons that you and others describe, but I also think that she sees the big picture and knows that the image that affects the vast general public will effect all of the conservative hopes for 2010, and that the general public does not see or want the same thing that the smaller number of us that despise McCain see or want.
I think that the media would have created an entire devastating narrative on the Arizona race that they would have used as a bludgeon against the Republicans and the Tea Parties and conservatives, and they would have buried Palin for good in an image of totally negative character and personality descriptions. It would all be incredibly ugly and while we here would see through it, the vast voting public would not, and that would effect all of our races nationally, and at the same time make Obama and his party look like a beacon of stability and consistency.
43 posted on 4/5/2010 4:12:41 PM by ansel12
Whatever you do, don’t consider policy differences... just pass it off as PDS.
Some of you folks display far more PDS than any of us do.
D, I guess I haven’t been paying attention, because I didn’t hear her say that she was supporting it. Will have to do some research on it for sure.
I can’t understand any conservative thinking it would be a GOOD thing to do legalize these folks when there are thousands of other people who got in line, did it the right way, and are waiting for the opportunity to be Americans.
The sad thing is, you have to go back years to draw attention away from massive policy failures today.
Are we facing a McCain/Palin ticket today? Are we facing a McCain run for re-election? No. We are facing an immigration fiasco.
And in the midst of that fiasco, you want to add one more voice that can back Rubio’s and the Left’s play over the next few months.
I’m don’t. Shame on you.
RE “PDS boy” etc., etc.,
It’s an opinion forum guys, that’s all... nobody here is the enemy. Just different opinions on people and issues that we all care about. We ALL love our country and want we think is best for it.
We should lay off the name calling and vitriol; one team, one fight.
Point guns outward, not inward. The other side hates us all equally whether we agree with each other or not.
Peace.
To be clear, I am not trying to state she has said she supports this bill.
It’s from her past interviews that I realize she has backed what’s in this bill before.
She wants to register illegals so they can stay here and work, support their families.
For that reason I cannot support the idea of her returning to FoxNews right now, so she can run interference for Rubio and the Left from there.
If we can’t be honest with ourselves, who can we be honest with?
Amen.
With all this on the table, your main consideration is why I don't support Sarah Palin
My main consideration is not why you don't support Palin. Palin, whether at Fox News or supporting Tea Party candidates isn't going to solve the immigration problem. I'm well aware of the illegal problem and how it has increased. I want to know who you believe is capable of solving the problem, or at the very least taking the lead in securing the borders. Especially in light of the fact that the majority of Americans just don't seem to GAS.
Did you see this?
We've already got around 30,000,000. Who in your opinion is the perfect person to solve the ongoing and future problem?
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 |
You trolling is especially messy and disjointed today.
Exactly. The vitriol and name calling is the main reason conservatives are so often on the losing end. Libs rally around their causes and candidates while conservatives fight among themselves with a holier-than-thou attitude .
No this is PDS, the thread topic is great news to conservatives, the most effective conservative leader in America is getting a slot on Fox news.
The PDS troll is on the wrong thread.
“...It’s from her past interviews that I realize she has backed what’s in this bill before...”
If that’s the case, I understand your point. I just have not heard her say those things.
It just gets ridiculous at times.
And who the hell feels like arguing with people who basically love and believe the same things you do, but disagree on an issue or person?
I get sick of it. I understand people get passionate but leave the name calling to the other side. It’s what they do.
How ya’ figure?
She was a Fox News commentator in 2010 when she helped lead the Tea Party victory that took back the House.
Being a Fox News commentator in 2014 will be no different.
Except she may have even MORE clout now.
Especially since she cleaned Rove’s clock in the 2012 election cycle dollar for dollar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.