Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Your Food Being 'Poisoned'?
Townhall.com ^ | June 11, 2013 | Chuck Norris

Posted on 06/11/2013 3:59:23 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

1 posted on 06/11/2013 3:59:23 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for the head-up! Yet one other thing we can thank the NWO for....


2 posted on 06/11/2013 4:02:56 AM PDT by ransacked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Last time I looked, GMAs look just like their unaltered brethren under a microscope.

So they aren’t objecting to GMAs since there are no facts to back up the assertion they are “poison.” They just object to the IDEA of GMAs.

If it wasn’t for emotion-laden hysteria like this we could feed every person on the face of the Earth quite cheaply. How many millions have died at the hands of these busybodies? More than Hitler and Stalin killed combined!


3 posted on 06/11/2013 4:08:04 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (To attempt to have intercourse with a hornet's nest is a very bad idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for the post. I started paying attention to this kind of thing within the last year and a half.


4 posted on 06/11/2013 4:09:53 AM PDT by sneakers (Go Sheriff Joe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I see no problem for me.
I bicycle to the town’s market every day.
I buy fresh pork or chicken, cut or ground to my wishes.
I buy fresh veges, grown on the near-by mountains.
I live in the vegetable capital of Cebu.
I do miss a good steak, as beef is very rare here.
The only beef option is to by frozen Aussie beef.
I tried it once...It was awful.


5 posted on 06/11/2013 4:15:28 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
DDT! DDT! ALAR! ALAR! GMOs! GMOs!

If you really want to find a corporation dedicated to killing its own consumers, look at governments (IRS, DOJ, NSA, etc.).

Maybe we deserve what we are getting.

6 posted on 06/11/2013 4:25:35 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (We say "low-information" but we mean "low-intelligence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
GM crops are tested for safety before they are commercialized.

Anti-GMO advocates ignore the stringent testing regime and insistently wave the great "maybe." Despite all the testing, and despite many years of safe use, GMO's "might," or "could," in "unforeseen or unanticipated ways" cause some unspecified harm. The boogeyman is going to get you.

The same tactics, of course, can be and often are used against anything new. We see this game being played with vaccines, with new medicines, and even with powerlines, wind turbines, cellphones, etc. Something that has never been detected, something that has evaded all testing, something for which there is NO scientific evidence, "might" get you.

And therefore, yet another beneficial technology should be halted because the luddite lobby has reversed the burden of proof and has everyone out chasing the ghost. One can always demand more testing, but when testing has already been done, why? And how much is enough?

GM crop varieties are tested before being commercialized. They are, btw, also tested independently by importing countries as well. The burden of proof has been met. Unfortunately, activist groups do not incur any penalties for making false charges. That is the asymmetry that keeps these bogus issues alive; the professional critics flit from one hysterical charge to another, and the rebuttals, which rely on evidence, can never keep up with the smear artists.

7 posted on 06/11/2013 4:34:12 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

freedumb2003 :

how easy it is to spot a *TROLL*


8 posted on 06/11/2013 4:41:03 AM PDT by PraiseTheLord (have you seen the fema camps, shackle box cars, thousands of guillotines, stacks of coffins ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Potentially, it could breed new animal and plant diseases, new sources of cancer, novel epidemics.

Or it could have a homeopathic effect. Almost everything in the world is good and bad in various quantities and a GMO is probably not an exception.

9 posted on 06/11/2013 4:50:59 AM PDT by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
GM crops are tested for safety before they are commercialized.

Some Starlink corn made it into the mass markets and on the shelves in consumer products by accident. A relative spent three sessions in the ER with what appeared to be a pesticide reaction before we figured out that one of those products was the problem. Yes, the product was contaminated with Starlink.

10 posted on 06/11/2013 4:54:12 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Sometimes these anti-GMO threads on FR make me feel like I am at Democratic Underground. They are rabid anti-GMO panic mongers too.


11 posted on 06/11/2013 4:55:00 AM PDT by Codeflier (Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Codeflier

-—and sorry to see Chuck Norris on the “nut” side of the fence-—


12 posted on 06/11/2013 5:00:31 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

sfl


13 posted on 06/11/2013 5:15:23 AM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The legal definition of the term is "any product or substance that can harm someone if it is used in the wrong way, by the wrong person, or in the wrong amount."

Soy sauce in the news recently - poison.

Drownings prove that water is a poison.

Any food with calories is a poison, including fats because they help dissolve real carcinogens to carry them to your bloodstream, sugars because of the diabetes risk, and proteins because of potential kidney damage. Are gravitons a substance? If so, the large number of deaths by falling are proof that gravity is a poison.

14 posted on 06/11/2013 5:34:35 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

All I’ve seen reported is that there are studies showing GMO is dangerous. There have been no studies showing are safe that I know of. I see reports of certain scientists defending GMOs, but I see no actual studies by these scientists. In fact, just the opposite in a web search for GMO studies showing they are safe ~

http://farmersforthefuture.ning.com/forum/topics/new-gmo-studies-give-further

http://www.naturalnews.com/031951_GMOs_safety_studies.html

And I suppose the naysayers believe Dr. Mercola to be a nutcase, too ~ http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/04/27/19-studies-link-gmo-foods-to-organ-disruption.aspx

http://responsibletechnology.org/gmo-dangers ~ with links to further negative health studies at the end.

Can anyone provide a link to an actual study showing GMOs are safe?


15 posted on 06/11/2013 5:35:33 AM PDT by My hearts in London - Everett (Gingrich or bust! (5/7/12, I guess it's bust.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My hearts in London - Everett

“Can anyone provide a link to an actual study showing GMOs are safe?”

Here is a recent study and review:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23414177

People have been eating GM food since the 90’s and currently ~90% of corn and soybeans are GM. If there were any real problems they would have shown up by now.


16 posted on 06/11/2013 5:58:14 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003; Codeflier
...Last time I looked, ,GMAs look just like their unaltered brethren under a microscope.

That can't be a true statement because the GM cells contain foriegn DNA.

...since there are no facts to back up the assertion they are “poison.”...

There is a long term study on GMO's done in France. I suppose you won't like it because it's French, but it was a good, well conducted study.

Monsanto hates it because it exposes them and has attacked it with much vigor. Their own study was for a short, 90 day period. The longer French study (700+ days I think) started seeing tumors after about 120 days.

17 posted on 06/11/2013 6:01:33 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

I wonder if the American Chemical Society that put out your info has any connection to Monsanto?


18 posted on 06/11/2013 6:09:03 AM PDT by My hearts in London - Everett (Gingrich or bust! (5/7/12, I guess it's bust.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When actors can’t find a job they find a cause.


19 posted on 06/11/2013 6:10:19 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
First, contact your governmental officials, and ask them to endorse or support legislation that requires food companies to start listing whether their products use GMOs.

There are GMOS that contain major modifications or additions, and there are those that do not (such as varieties of fruit that mature earlier or later to spread out production over a longer season). "Labeling" as GMO does not address this. It is an issue too complex for government to manager and cries for third-party certification and labeling.

As it is, labeling products as "containing GMO" will end up just like Prop 65 labeling in California, with the labels on virtually everything saying that 'the product contains chemicals that cause cancer,' making the act of labeling for GMO meaningless.

20 posted on 06/11/2013 6:35:33 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson