Posted on 06/10/2013 5:54:55 AM PDT by Biggirl
President Obama has said the outrage over the federal governments decision to monitor citizens phone activity is all hype.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Revolt is coming.
Got to remember that these same armed forces folks do talk to family/friends back home. The cat is out of the bag.
The movie is relevant now.
Enemy of the State (1998)
132 min - Action | Drama | Thriller - 20 November 1998 (USA)
A lawyer becomes a target by a corrupt politician and his NSA goons when he accidentally receives key evidence to a serious politically motivated crime.
Plot
As the U.S. Congress moves to pass new legislation that dramatically expands the surveillance powers of intelligence agencies, Congressman Phil Hammersley (Robards) remains firmly opposed to its passage. To ensure the bill’s passage, National Security Agency official Thomas Reynolds (Voight) kills Hammersley, but he is unaware of a video camera set up by wildlife researcher Daniel Zavitz (Lee) that has captured the entire incident.
Storyline
Robert dean is a mild-mannered lawyer who works in Washington D.C. He is on the trail of a kingpin named Pintero. Meanwhile, a politician named Thomas Reynolds is negotiating with Congressman Phillip Hammersley about a new surveillance system with satellites. But, Hammersley declines, that is when Reynolds had Hammersley killed, but this murder was caught on tape, and this person was being chased by Reynolds’ team of NSA agents, the guy must ditch the tape, so he plants it on Dean (unbeknownst to Dean). Then, the NSA decides to get into Dean’s life. That is when Dean’s life began to fall apart all around him, with his wife and job both gone. Dean wants to find out what is going on. Then, he meets a man named “Brill” who tells him that Dean has something that the government wants. That is when Dean and Brill formulate a plan to get Dean’s life back and turn the Tables on Reynolds. Written by John Wiggins
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_State_%28film%29
Thank-you!
Isn’t this akin to waving a red flag in front of a bull? The first reaction: Gee, what is it my bosses don’t want me to know? Hmmmmm.
The troops swore a oath to the US Constitution.
> They now have massive intel, on all Americans, which coupled with 100% control of your health care can effectively eliminate all opposition to their socialist ideology.
Sounds like a good time to start a disinformation campaign. Use their snooping as a tool to use against them. Defund them by refusing to pay taxes on a massive scale. No money, no government. But it would have to be on a massive scale to have any real impact.
I remember when a tyrannical Orwellian government used to only exist in the future on shows on the SyFy channel. Now this doesn’t seem too funny:
Did it ever occur to you to read the article (and note the deceptive headline), or any of the replies by the few people on this thread that actually know what they are talking about?
There’s been no ban on reading articles about Obama scandals by the military. The issue is the Washington Post and Guardian have posted Top Secret material. It’s not automatically unclassified because it’s been leaked to the media. The rules say that any leakage of classified onto an unclassified military computer is a huge deal, basically the computer needs to be completely erased, there’s huge amounts of paperwork, etc.
The exact same notice went out about Bradley Manning and that you couldn’t go to Wikileaks on an unclassified DoD or DoD contractor computer.
“The kids are a lot wiser today, and theyve already got the goods on you”
They have the Internet, but “wiser”? No way. More lazy, brainwashed, and PC; that isn’t wiser.
What Obama has been doing would make Nixon look more and more like a “saint”.
If true, good luck with that.
The more often, the better.
Yes it is telling them to not use the military internet, but that is the internet available on many bases and overseas military communities. So, in essence, it is telling members to not read because that is the only internet available to them if they live on the base. So, you are partially correct, but the intent is to limit information negative to Obama
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.