Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military Told Not To Read Obama-Scandal News
WND ^ | June 10, 2013 | Gina Loudon

Posted on 06/10/2013 5:54:55 AM PDT by Biggirl

President Obama has said the outrage over the federal government’s decision to monitor citizens’ phone activity is all “hype.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: altereddate; armedforces; bhodod; obama; obamascandals; usaf; verizon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Biggirl
Comrades, no bad news of scandals of Gen. Mao Obama to the military....
21 posted on 06/10/2013 6:45:01 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
If Obama has to report it not to read any bad news of Obama scandals ? 80 - 90 % of the military's grunts already know about it and it's to late to lock the gennie back in the bottle.
Now his leftist voters are starting to doubt him along with some of the MSM just starting to smell the coffee.

22 posted on 06/10/2013 6:49:01 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: paguch

Revolt is coming.


23 posted on 06/10/2013 6:49:46 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Got to remember that these same armed forces folks do talk to family/friends back home. The cat is out of the bag.


24 posted on 06/10/2013 6:50:45 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
" President Obama has said the outrage over the federal government’s decision to monitor citizens’ phone activity is all “hype.” "

Any private citizen with any kind of intelligence or anyone in the military with any kind of intelligence knows he is lying and read just the opposite of what his statement means.
25 posted on 06/10/2013 6:51:00 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

The movie is relevant now.

Enemy of the State (1998)

132 min - Action | Drama | Thriller - 20 November 1998 (USA)

A lawyer becomes a target by a corrupt politician and his NSA goons when he accidentally receives key evidence to a serious politically motivated crime.

Plot

As the U.S. Congress moves to pass new legislation that dramatically expands the surveillance powers of intelligence agencies, Congressman Phil Hammersley (Robards) remains firmly opposed to its passage. To ensure the bill’s passage, National Security Agency official Thomas Reynolds (Voight) kills Hammersley, but he is unaware of a video camera set up by wildlife researcher Daniel Zavitz (Lee) that has captured the entire incident.

Storyline

Robert dean is a mild-mannered lawyer who works in Washington D.C. He is on the trail of a kingpin named Pintero. Meanwhile, a politician named Thomas Reynolds is negotiating with Congressman Phillip Hammersley about a new surveillance system with satellites. But, Hammersley declines, that is when Reynolds had Hammersley killed, but this murder was caught on tape, and this person was being chased by Reynolds’ team of NSA agents, the guy must ditch the tape, so he plants it on Dean (unbeknownst to Dean). Then, the NSA decides to get into Dean’s life. That is when Dean’s life began to fall apart all around him, with his wife and job both gone. Dean wants to find out what is going on. Then, he meets a man named “Brill” who tells him that Dean has something that the government wants. That is when Dean and Brill formulate a plan to get Dean’s life back and turn the Tables on Reynolds. Written by John Wiggins

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_State_%28film%29


26 posted on 06/10/2013 6:54:48 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimtom

Thank-you!


27 posted on 06/10/2013 6:55:23 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Isn’t this akin to waving a red flag in front of a bull? The first reaction: Gee, what is it my bosses don’t want me to know? Hmmmmm.


28 posted on 06/10/2013 6:56:27 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus
Nebuchadnezzar

The God of Israel because of Nebuchadnezzar pride and arrogance caused him to go crazy in his mind and he ate in the fields as a wild animal until he humbled himself.


Painting by William Blake of Nebuchadnezzar gone mad.
29 posted on 06/10/2013 6:57:36 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

The troops swore a oath to the US Constitution.


30 posted on 06/10/2013 6:58:18 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paguch

> They now have massive intel, on all Americans, which coupled with 100% control of your health care can effectively eliminate all opposition to their socialist ideology.

Sounds like a good time to start a disinformation campaign. Use their snooping as a tool to use against them. Defund them by refusing to pay taxes on a massive scale. No money, no government. But it would have to be on a massive scale to have any real impact.

I remember when a tyrannical Orwellian government used to only exist in the future on shows on the SyFy channel. Now this doesn’t seem too funny:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=demolition%20man%20movie%20fined%20cursing&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CC0QtwIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DLE3oczJ1zgM&ei=Fdu1UZLAK7TlygHC5YGwBw&usg=AFQjCNFkNTsp-iZvECq8d7HBnGFxLdp7Eg&bvm=bv.47534661,d.aWc


31 posted on 06/10/2013 6:58:20 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Did it ever occur to you to read the article (and note the deceptive headline), or any of the replies by the few people on this thread that actually know what they are talking about?

There’s been no ban on reading articles about Obama scandals by the military. The issue is the Washington Post and Guardian have posted Top Secret material. It’s not automatically unclassified because it’s been leaked to the media. The rules say that any leakage of classified onto an unclassified military computer is a huge deal, basically the computer needs to be completely erased, there’s huge amounts of paperwork, etc.

The exact same notice went out about Bradley Manning and that you couldn’t go to Wikileaks on an unclassified DoD or DoD contractor computer.


32 posted on 06/10/2013 7:01:51 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“The kids are a lot wiser today, and they’ve already got the goods on you”

They have the Internet, but “wiser”? No way. More lazy, brainwashed, and PC; that isn’t wiser.


33 posted on 06/10/2013 7:08:16 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Yes, your right, however ? how far is that to come to reality ? Would you put it past them to do such a thing ?
34 posted on 06/10/2013 7:11:06 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

What Obama has been doing would make Nixon look more and more like a “saint”.


35 posted on 06/10/2013 7:15:05 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

If true, good luck with that.


36 posted on 06/10/2013 7:16:32 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

37 posted on 06/10/2013 7:56:11 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
military
38 posted on 06/10/2013 7:57:18 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

The more often, the better.


39 posted on 06/10/2013 8:01:01 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Yes it is telling them to not use the military internet, but that is the internet available on many bases and overseas military communities. So, in essence, it is telling members to not read because that is the only internet available to them if they live on the base. So, you are partially correct, but the intent is to limit information negative to Obama


40 posted on 06/10/2013 8:51:54 AM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson