Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fracturing in California - Democrats revolt against a ban on oil and gas 'fracking.'
Wall Street Journal ^ | June 7, 2013 | Masthead Editorial

Posted on 06/08/2013 11:37:15 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: neverdem

Follow the money, folks!

I live in the Marcellus Shale.

Our school district just cut taxes in half thanks to revenues from hydrocarbon extraction. It is a conservatively run district, so, they didn’t just “spend” the increased revenues....not something you see in the more liberally controlled school districts.

Even liberals have a hard time turning down money like that!


21 posted on 06/09/2013 6:22:19 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
What are the chemicals used and are the same chemicals used at every frack site?

See FracFocus, What Chemicals Are Used.

22 posted on 06/09/2013 6:34:41 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

In the irony of ironies, Beverly Hills High School has its own oil well...


23 posted on 06/09/2013 6:41:22 AM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of opression, and the democrats gleefully use them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Whereas SatinDoll's sister owns both the surface and sub-surface rights, there are going to be a landowners opposed to this drilling because they have to suffer the activity of drilling but won't receive a royalty.

Owners of surface rights are due compensation for disturbance of the surface, can rent out rights-of-way for roads, pipelines, etc, and are in a position to demand surface damages and production location rent as well, if production infrastructure is positioned or drilling activity is carried out on their property.

Have a knowledgeable attorney look over any contracts before signing--if it isn't in print, it isn't included--make sure the compensation is sufficient and comprehensive in print before signing.

Just leasing or owning mineral rights does not grant access or surface rights.

24 posted on 06/09/2013 6:50:27 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
I suspect for a land swap involving the BLM, as in Nevada 20-years ago, the one that involved Sen.Harry Reid.

Boy that bring up a memory...

A freeper here eons ago and I got on the topic of micro-turbines and the exotic metals in any jet engine. he quipped ( and I can't remember the nick-name) of the enviromental types that buy up tracks of land full of minerals etc and sit on it for eons knowing full well it will be worth a fortune. His point was turbines would be cheaper if we went after the metals which the enviro-weenies are sitting on. I don't totally agree, they are expensive engines, but you get the point.

So what else is Reid sitting on?

I am so cynical that I would bet a donut and coffee that Prince Andrew in NY is stalling Fracking their so all the cronies, hacks and lackies and buy up the land and clean up in the deal...

Progressive / Liberals talk a good line about being for the people bla, bla, bla, but when it comes to their taxes or making money they are vicious, been their, done that...

25 posted on 06/09/2013 6:52:43 AM PDT by taildragger (( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Even liberals have a hard time turning down money like that!

That's why I posted a while back that the CA enviros would be thrown under the bus when it came to fracking - just TOO much money for the Democrats' other spending plans to resist.

26 posted on 06/09/2013 7:08:50 AM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas

mineral rights are owned by most farmers...My husband and I bought a 10 1/2 acre farm, we also at that time aquired the mineral rights....The law in that township said no farm animals unless you had over 10 acres...thats why it was sold and a 10 1/2 acre farm. Also affected our taxes as argiculture and not resident homestead.... This was back in 1985.


27 posted on 06/09/2013 9:16:30 AM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Fracturing = Earth Quakes

They already have fracturing drill baby drill


28 posted on 06/09/2013 9:43:15 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
This was sanity prevailing in the form of raw self interest

Well said -- all of your post. It's that part about CA sliding into a liberal dystopia that illustrates their total hypocrisy. Their actual self interest isn't financial, it's about power. And yes, it's nice to have other people's money around to finance more liberal lunacy as well...as long as the voters in Malibu, Santa Monica, San Francisco etc. aren't inconvenienced by the actual drilling.

29 posted on 06/09/2013 9:51:45 AM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thackney
So I can stop going out to the back 40 and shooting at the ground hoping to produce a gusher of oil?

: > )

Seriously though, things have changed a lot in the last few decades.

It's amazing because of the lack of future technology back towards the last few decades of the last century, alarmist/environmentalists were predicting running out of oil long before today.

The reserves are monumental with what has been found, and possible to extract, with the advances in technology.

30 posted on 06/09/2013 10:45:49 AM PDT by Syncro ("So?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; rktman; blam; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ...

Thanks neverdem.


31 posted on 06/09/2013 10:57:23 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Whoa, a glimmer of sanity here in California. Who’d a thunk it?


32 posted on 06/09/2013 7:17:27 PM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

What this article shows is that for all their protested and fronted indifference to money, Democrats love money.


33 posted on 06/10/2013 4:29:31 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
That's why Pennsylvania and Ohio are openly supporting fracking and as a result, both states will experience economic booms from NOT having to import natural gas from out of state. Indeed, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's reluctance to allow fracking could cost that state TENS of billions in state revenue.
34 posted on 06/10/2013 5:43:37 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson