Posted on 05/21/2013 12:24:00 PM PDT by lowbridge
No, most normal people would call him a "lying sack of $#it."
I've got a feeling that before too much longer, people are going to start getting fed up with the lies from politicians.
Mark
Sort of hard to doctor e-mails that the White House won’t give you. They wouldn’t let the reporters have the documents, so one of them made an error in transcription. Then they pull out the original document and try to play “gotcha” games with it. They forced the error, now they’re complaining about it.
And, in fact, it’s a side issue.
When can we expect to hear them decrying the real case of doctoring on the Zimmerman tapes? What was that old Mathis song? Oh yeah, “The Twelfth of Never”.
No. The article even states that it did not occur. There were apparently slightly different versions circulating, but the different versions were quite similar to each other. Remember that the reporters were only allowed to look at the e-mails, not take notes, so possibly there was some inexactitude, but not over the essential facts (the e-mails seen by the reporters mentioned the State Dept, the need to keep the information from pointing to the State Dept., and the need for further work on the talking points).
If anybody doctored anything, it was whoever in the WH produced this supposedly authoritative e-mail, which is so doctored it says nothing and was obviously just done for the occasion.
What could possibly be gained by that?
They were hoping that enough of the media lapdogs would run with the story that Republicans doctored the emails before the media realized they were being thrown under the bus. It almost worked.
All right. Who put the LSD in the Post’s water cooler?
“Thats a very serious offense that happened where Republicans on the Hill, we voluntarily provided these e-mails to, took one of them, doctored it and gave it to ABC News in an attempt to smear the president.
Nobody has to try and “smear” this pos, poseur presbo-—he loves wallowing in the poop he has created.
“Have you seen anything like it before?”
Um yah, Something about a You Tube video?
(Tell him what he’s won, Jay.)
Whoa! Three? The Washington Post just about called the guy a liar... Looks like one paper wants their credibility back... Defending conservatives will destroy their chance of winning a pulitzer... takes guts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.