She's also cute although brainless looking. That's not relevant either. She's accused of a serious crime and she has pretty much admitted guilt.
This is a link to the petition mentioned within the article. Incredibly, after a day over 64,000 supporters of homosexual pedophilia have signed it. It is in serious need of a Freepin', my fellow Freepers.
Pederasty, not pedophilia. There’s a difference.
It isn’t a “relationship.” Its molestation.
We know where this idiocy and scandal started.
And Frepers thought that these fags couldn’t get any lower. It’s a bottomless pit when it comes to immorality with these sick pukes.
Quid pro Quid. What’s good for the goose is good for the goose, etc.
The laws are for everybody!
These people keep saying “dated”. If all they did was “date”, I don’t think there would be a legal issue.
A young man would be prosecuted in the same case. What makes this woman so special?
She's also cute although brainless looking. That's not relevant either. She's accused of a serious crime and she has pretty much admitted guilt.
They wanted equality with heterosexuals, well guess what? They got it.
So let me get this right.
If one has sex with an underage minor then in the eyes and minds of some that is alright and laws were not broken.
Why does the article have to make this about being homosexual , when it clearly is about a minor having sex and being molested.
“the two began dating at the beginning of the school year.”
Really? Dating? Did the parents of the then 14-year-old know about this “relationship”? Treat this pervert exactly as you would a young man who would do this to a minor female.
Since they can’t naturally reproduce they must recruit and the younger the better to begin twisting the mind.
If they cannot twist your sex, K-12 sure can dumb down your mind.
How many heterosexual males have been prosecuted and listed as sex offenders for life? Welcome to equality baby! You want it, you have to take all of it ! I have no sympathy, where was the author every time a young man was prosecuted in the same situation?
They want special privileges! Too &^$#@) bad! If an adult, 18 or over, ‘dates’ an underage girl he can go to jail. The same law MUST apply to this case, or the law is invalid.
Too bad, girl! You want to have special privileges? Sorry. Jail for you!
The sympathetic tone of the article is designed to bring out sympathy from the reader, and to turn off rational thinking.
Now LOVIN is against the law ??? Life is soooo unfair...HA-HA
Boo-Hoo-Hoo, an 18 year old (woman) seducing a 15 year old of the same sex gets arrested for it.
Of course the author leaves out a few key facts: Its the ‘sex’ between them that is illegal not the ‘relationship’ or the 'love'.
And without the 15 year old’s word, or some other eye witness, there is no case,
As ridiculous as this will sound, by the logic postulated by the obvious pro-gay folks in the article...SOME of the cases of sex by Catholic Priest’s should be ignored...after all it was love or consensual but gay.
Like I said RIDICULOUS...Every one of those sicko priests should pay dearly, but clearly here the pro gay lifestyle folks want a dismissal of a violation of law because of the GAY element when its not even a part of the charge. This is Statutory RAPE folks....I have no pity and every fool who “signes their emoting petition” is simply being used to usurp the law...NOT uphold it...just to help the gay agenda.
Yeah and it happened to Marcus Dixon because he was black, now it happens because she’s gay. Maybe the thing the two have in common—they broke the law.
It happens to straight white folk, too. It’s the law and watch the law change...then what happens?
Kaitlyn Hunt... K Hunt... hmmm.
So just curious, the definition of statutory rape is: “The criminal offense of statutory rape is committed when an adult sexually penetrates a person who, under the law, is incapable of consenting to sex. Minors and physically and mentally incapacitated persons are deemed incapable of consenting to sex under rape statutes in all states. These persons are considered deserving of special protection because they are especially vulnerable due to their youth or condition.
So since I don’t know what this 18 year old girls “situation” is, I would assume she isn’t equipped with the equipment to “sexually penetrate” and therefore not capable of “sealing the deal.”
Thank God I’m not a lawyer, and if I were the underage girl’s father I would still be mad as hell. But this may not go anywhere.
Isnt therean exception to those child protection laws for those who identity themselves as LBGT?
Well there should be..... it was just love(her mom claims) .... that is what LGBT is all about ...love....love is a conservative principle.....Obama’s conservative principle as he ‘evolved’
This girl is being treated the way an 18 year old boy who is having sex with a 15 year old girl would be treated.
That is “equality” at work.