Skip to comments.
DOJ on ‘Gays’: ‘Silence Will be Interpreted as Disapproval’
Townhall ^
| 05/20/2013
| Matt Barber
Posted on 05/20/2013 9:51:55 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Here’s my answer. Google Southpark, Garrison, Buttsex, evolution.
2
posted on
05/20/2013 9:52:51 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: SeekAndFind
Only EVIL people approve of Homosexuals.
Those who support homosexuals are
against our Heavenly Father and His Son Jesus Christ.
These anti Christ people only bring destruction on us ALL.
I have
NO sympathy for homosexuals!
Homosexuality is a
"Mark" of disobedience.
Someone once asked"Why are they [homosexuals] all so angry?"
The answer is in the definition of "
REPROBATE".
rep·ro·bate \ˈre-prə-ˌbāt\ a. [L. reprobatus, reprobo, to disallow; re and probo, to prove.]
- 1. Not enduring proof or trial; not of standard purity or fineness; disallowed; rejected.
-
Reprobate silver shall men call them, because the Lord hath rejected them. Jer. 6.
- 2. Abandoned in sin; lost to virtue or grace.
-
They profess that they know God, but in works deny him, being abominable and disobedient, and to every good work reprobate. Titus 1.
- 3. Abandoned to error, or in apostasy. 2Tim. 3.
And the reason
"why" is
given in the Bible.
God has
a cure for homosexuals.
But will we OBEY our Heavenly Father?
3
posted on
05/20/2013 9:55:18 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: SeekAndFind
Tell DOJ, “You own this problem and I’m not endorsing anything I don’t believe.”
4
posted on
05/20/2013 9:56:39 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Darkness Hates the Light)
To: SeekAndFind
“I didn’t hear a harump from that guy”. Mel Brooks
5
posted on
05/20/2013 10:00:08 AM PDT
by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: SeekAndFind
Actually, my reading of the document is that “silence” will be construed as disapproval by an LGBT employee. I believe that that is a factual statement. The statement is not a threat to a manager.
It is only a threat as far as someone assuming that a feeling of disapproval from an LGBT employee could lead to consequences. You are free to read this into the document, but it isn’t an overt threat.
To: SeekAndFind
As I have said, the rump rangers are no longer satisfied to be accepted,they must be publicly praised.
7
posted on
05/20/2013 10:00:41 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
To: SeekAndFind
LOL ... speaking is trouble, and silence is trouble ... LOL. It is an obamanation!
8
posted on
05/20/2013 10:02:15 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
To: the_Watchman
I had a Facebook “Friend” defriend me, because they noticed that I never “liked” and of their pro-gay propaganda they posted, although I never even commented on it....they clearly wanted affirmation, and they simply defriended anyone who didn’t do so....no big loss.
9
posted on
05/20/2013 10:02:43 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind; All
Me: Hello Mr. gay co-worker.
Gay co-worker: Hello.
Me: What did you do this weekend?
Gay co-worker: My gay boyfriend and I went Antiquing and then we had a parade.
Me: Breath mint!
11
posted on
05/20/2013 10:06:28 AM PDT
by
areukiddingme1
(areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
To: the_Watchman
It is only a threat as far as someone assuming that a feeling of disapproval from an LGBT employee could lead to consequences. You are free to read this into the document, but it isnt an overt threat.Yes, but according to the most basic tenets of PC theory, if you feel threatened, then you are threatened, and the intent of the speaker or writer is irrelevant.
12
posted on
05/20/2013 10:07:32 AM PDT
by
Maceman
(Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
To: Yosemitest
I guess when Jesus dealt with that sexually immoral woman at the well he really blasted her, didn’t he?
Why is it so hard for people to separate an abhorrence for sin from expressing God’s love for the sinner? Judgement will certainly come, but it is not ours to deliver.
To: no-to-illegals
Just like in Stalinist Russia, you were detained if you didn’t denounce anyone to authorities...they figured you must be against the government if you didn’t turn somebody else in.
14
posted on
05/20/2013 10:07:37 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: dfwgator
15
posted on
05/20/2013 10:08:35 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
To: SeekAndFind
I have come to conclude that I can no longer participate with this tyranical government.
16
posted on
05/20/2013 10:10:29 AM PDT
by
Dogbert41
(Thy Kingdom come!)
To: SeekAndFind
DONT judge or remain silent. Silence will be interpreted as disapproval.Will those who choose to remain silent be simply terminated or will they face prosecution? And if so, will they be read the Miranda warning..."You have the right to remain silent..."
17
posted on
05/20/2013 10:11:02 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(For me, I plan to die standing as a free man rather than spend one second on my knees as a slave.)
To: the_Watchman
“Why is it so hard for people to separate an abhorrence for sin from expressing Gods love for the sinner? Judgement will certainly come, but it is not ours to deliver.”
Please don’t be a moral idiot.
The woman you refer to was not flaunting her sin in peoples faces demanding their approval..
Time to man-up.
To: SeekAndFind
Silence seems like disapproval.A properly formed piece of mud seems like chocolate cake. But it isn't.
19
posted on
05/20/2013 10:14:02 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(For me, I plan to die standing as a free man rather than spend one second on my knees as a slave.)
To: Maceman
Yes, but according to the most basic tenets of PC theory, if you feel threatened, then you are threatened, and the intent of the speaker or writer is irrelevant. Yes, and that is why it is legitimate to read an implicit threat into the document. I am just pointing out that the wording is not actually a direct threat or even a direct order. The wording is of an observation.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson