Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/11/2013 8:18:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think Obama wiped his a$$ with them one too many times.

Joking that they worked for Axelrod for the last 5 years was not going to sit well.

When you are willingly getting your ass kissed on a daily basis you don’t make jokes about the soft mushiness of the kisser’s lips.


2 posted on 05/11/2013 8:22:46 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Would that this were so.

Let us hope and pray.

But a chill voice tells me that these guys will wake up the next morning with dreadful hangovers, and then proceed to return to their usual ways.


3 posted on 05/11/2013 8:23:21 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why is the MSM so suddenly concerned with its credibility?


5 posted on 05/11/2013 8:24:38 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am watching the presser now. Unbelievable. Carney is such a terrible liar.

You think that could pick someone with a bit of street smart dishonesty to at least produce half plausible lies.

This historic press conference should be a case example for forensics experts who study deceptive behavior.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=iLlds2npBwg


6 posted on 05/11/2013 8:25:21 PM PDT by garjog (Heroes Died. Obama Lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

8 posted on 05/11/2013 8:27:32 PM PDT by garjog (Heroes Died. Obama Lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“I appreciate the question” = wait until you here this answer that I’ve been working on all day, good eh?


10 posted on 05/11/2013 8:30:03 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Don’t worry; come Monday morning, they’ll have their minds right.


14 posted on 05/11/2013 8:31:19 PM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is the decades-late media audit, the return of professionalism and honor, finally underway this evening?

Honor? Not a chance. None of these liberal sycophants could find the word in the dictionary, much less comprehend the definition were it read to them.

15 posted on 05/11/2013 8:31:34 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We'll see if this topples the administration. We really just need three questions answered....and admittedly not all eventual true answers necessarily will have nefarious origins...although it is hard to imagine otherwise. The three questions we need answered are:

1) Why was security so lax at a US embassy in a hostile country on the anniversary of 9/11?

2) Why was no attempt made to help the embassy staff when the poop start hitting?

3) Why did the administration lie about the true perpetrators and motivations of the attack?

My guess is that Obama had convinced himself that the GOP was the cause of terrorism in the world and with him (Obama) in the Oval Office Al Qaeda in its allies would have no reason to attack us (Yes, Obama lives in la-la land). When the attack occurred, Obama refused to send help in order to keep the ‘story’ as small as possible and, therefore; his reelection chances as large as possible. The video story was also invented to keep the story ‘small.’

If Obama truly didn't send help just to keep his reelection chances ‘large’, that would certainly be immoral and impeachable. While I do think this is what happened, I think it is also very difficult if not impossible to prove. Obama is way too smart to get caught in that ‘trick-bag.’...unless someone leaks damning evidence.

This leaves us with catching Obama ‘red-handed’ lying to the public about the silly video. It's not a lot but, at least it's something. In the end, this likely damages Obama but, does not destroy him. His media allies just won't let it happen.

17 posted on 05/11/2013 8:32:06 PM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

BS

Now the MSM has its cover to say, "Whaddya mean we're in the tank for the administration? Look how we grilled Carney over Benghazi! Besides, gun running to Mexico started under Bush!"
19 posted on 05/11/2013 8:37:45 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“CBS News President David Rhodes and ABC News President Ben Sherwood, both of them have siblings that not only work at the White House, that not only work for President Obama, but they work at the NSC on foreign policy issues directly related to Benghazi.”

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/#ixzz2T2oXFtvJ

Moderators have at least twice pulled this “Post”. No rationale or comment to affirm or debunk this story line.


22 posted on 05/11/2013 8:52:08 PM PDT by Broker (Obama, the devils fart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
no Democratic administration has been charged from all sides like this in recent memory...and so sometimes we have to step back a bit and try to do a little mega analysis - figure out what the big picture is - how come all of a sudden the MSM have all these different versions of the talking points in question, as well as internal memos from the Department of State, how come all of a sudden the IRS is apologizing for inappropriately investigating conservative groups, and then today we find out this was known to IRS since 2011, before the last campaign - and why is the MSM all of a sudden so interesting in these stories - it was apparently the AP which released today's IRS bombshell - who's trying to sink who??? - well, Obama is certainly the one who seems most damaged overall by these revelations. but then he was just reelected and can't run again, so maybe he's expendable - maybe the 'rat thugs and their MSM henchmen have decided to throw him under the bus this time, as a distraction and scape goat to save the a$$ of whom they want to elect in 2016, Hillary - yeah, that gets my vote.....
25 posted on 05/11/2013 9:01:26 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I don't know. Maybe.

I still do not trust the "news" media. Maybe their feelings are hurt because they trusted zero and selected him to be their anointed boy-king and he has let them down. They may cut bait on him, but to me, I wouldn't let them off. The media need to know we hold them responsible just as much as we do zero.

If they turn on zero and do Watergate-style investigative journalism on him, so what? They are just as responsible for the mess we are in for helping him, for covering for him; for going after conservatives/Repubs with doctored videos, un-reported stories, and publishing DNC talking points as straight news stories.

I think they are just letting zero know that they don't like being left hanging and he needs to give them something to CYA for themselves. Once he does that, it'll be all unicorns and rainbows again for the "news" media.

32 posted on 05/11/2013 9:21:34 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He NEVER actually answered the very first question! “When did the White House learn of the IRS’ targeting of Tea Party Groups? NEVER ANWERED. He said “we certainly know about it” then changed the subject and no one called him on it. They haven’t changed a bit!


33 posted on 05/11/2013 9:23:38 PM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
he was flanked by the entire room

Indeed. They flanked him rotten, baby!

35 posted on 05/11/2013 10:17:33 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
If true, it's about time. But I ain't trusting 'til I see it for real.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


Benghazi Index

36 posted on 05/11/2013 10:52:18 PM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

bump for later


39 posted on 05/11/2013 11:22:34 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (The USSA. Born 7/4/1776. Committed suicide 11/6/2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I too am doubtful about any road to damascus moment for the press. Now we find news corprations related to the administration....blood is thicker than water. However, The Blaze has been calling them out for weeks and months on this. I have to hand it to Glenn... his sources have been truthful and he has been leading this. The youth and the truth behind The Blaze is a big smack across the face of aging hippie communists everywhere. True debate, reason and agreeing to disagree on his show. Rush should free himself from the media plantation as well.


40 posted on 05/12/2013 2:05:46 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The only time a Democrat will face criticism is when the MSM wants him to do something. “Either do what we want or we’ll expose you”. Look for a big announcement from the President.


42 posted on 05/12/2013 5:54:58 AM PDT by AppyPappy (You never see a massacre at a gun show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; mickie
I want to see a complete list of the names of the various media gerbilists that participated in that SECRET meeting.

Since when do American presidents take it upon themselves to COMMAND secrecy be observed before, during and after a secret meeting with a so-called "free press"

What happened to the much-touted "transparency" in this administration promised by the promise-abuser?

Every media gerbilist that agreed upfront to that secrecy caveat and participated in that devils' conclave doesn't have an ounce of integrity, honor or love of country....and a roster of their shameful names should be published far and wide for all to see.

Leni

44 posted on 05/12/2013 7:17:01 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson