http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_members_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives_by_seniority
All the Dems have to do is work to divide the social conservatives and fiscal conservatives and they win.
Just like every other election.
Take that Karl.
It just could have been that Sanford confessed his sins and took the punishment, unlike Bill Clinton, Anthony Weiner et al.
The Dems defended Bill Clinton too much and got bit for it.
Sanford debates Nancy Pelosi.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/01/sanford-focused-on-pelosi-in-run-up-to-vote/
Did Pelosi cause C-B to lose?
“If Democrats Can’t Beat a Confessed Adulterer, What Chance Do They Have?” ALL of the “politically blue” areas of the U.S. and U.S. territories would like to have the realistic opportunity to be able to say the same thing, asap!
Run against the Democratic Party!
LLS
If Republicans Can’t Beat Idiots, Thieves, Tax Cheats, Traitors, Pedophiles, and Philanderers, What Chance Do They Have?
They have Communist Muslim Queer bastards and we have womanizers..Which would you rather have..(sarcasm)
The Democrat Party is completely bankrupt in respect to morality. There is not an iota of goodness in the entire evil cabal.
It’s true that Mark Sanford did not honor his wedding vows; however, those Democrats and many Republicrats will never honor their oath of office.
Examining Sanford as he stood before voters during this congressional election would indicate that politically he remains unchanged. He is a fiscal conservative. Those he represents will have to evaluate his performance, not the rest of us here.
The thing was that many women did not see this as adultery as much as a failing marriage, and true love. World of difference.
To start with, they accept the idea that some marriages just don’t work out, and as long as it is an amicable split, it is okay.
But in this case, he obviously loves this woman so much that he went all the way to Argentina to get her. That makes it into a “romantic” relationship, that many women can forgive. As long as he marries her, and promptly.
It is also a study in contrasts, as the woman running against him was pretty odious, deceitful, and made the foolish mistake of thinking early in the campaign that she was so far ahead she could blurt out what she really thought, that was both radical leftist and stupid. Pardon the redundancy.
Good point. This last election (Sanford) has me shaking my head and thinking: “Anyone else notice how bad the democRATs lose when the Chicago “Get out the Vote” and cheat push is not involved?”
Same thing prior to the election.