Skip to comments.
Copyright troll Righthaven finally, completely dead
arstechnica (can't be posted to FR per copyright complaint)
| May 9, 2013
| by Nate Anderson
Posted on 05/09/2013 12:27:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
"Never had standing to sue, Ninth Circuit confirms."
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/05/copyright-troll-righthaven-finally-completely-dead/
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Free Republic; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: copyright; copyrighttroll; dbm; jimrobinson; righthaven; troll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Jim Robinson
2
posted on
05/09/2013 12:27:45 PM PDT
by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: Jim Robinson
Really, most sincerely dead?
3
posted on
05/09/2013 12:27:49 PM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Truth/Lies; Liberty/Tyranny--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE??)
To: Jim Robinson
Excellent news!!! Good riddance to bad rubbish.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Jim Robinson
Nuke ‘em from orbit.
It’s the only way to be sure.
To: Jim Robinson
Can we just, ya know, give ‘em a little double-tap just to make sure?
8
posted on
05/09/2013 12:30:44 PM PDT
by
kevkrom
To: kevkrom
Or kill it with fire. Fire is always a good answer.
9
posted on
05/09/2013 12:31:19 PM PDT
by
kevkrom
To: Jim Robinson
To: Jim Robinson
To: All
On the other hand, Bloomberg reports a bit of bad news in the ruling that could concern all bloggers:
“The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sealed the fate of copyright enforcer Righthaven LLC today by ruling that the minima; “right to sue” copyright assignments that Righthaven acquired from newspaper publishers did not confer standing to sue third parties for copyright infringement.”
“So far, that’s good news for bloggers and others who had been targetted by Righthaven. However, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling contained a bit of bad news for them: along the way, the court vacated the lower court’s ruling that the defendant’s posting of the entirety of a copyighted article to an online discussion board was a protected fair use.”
http://www.bna.com/ninth-circuit-vacates-b17179873884/
12
posted on
05/09/2013 12:35:12 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: Jim Robinson
So has the policy here changed in any way?
13
posted on
05/09/2013 12:38:24 PM PDT
by
henkster
(I have one more cow than my neighbor. I am a kulak.)
To: Jim Robinson
“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” - Dick the Butcher, “Henry VI,” part two, act four
14
posted on
05/09/2013 12:39:44 PM PDT
by
redpoll
To: Jim Robinson
Is it "Really most sincerely dead"?.......
15
posted on
05/09/2013 12:42:50 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
To: Jim Robinson
Excellent news. My solution to the Las Vegas Review-Journal quandary was not only to never post an article from there, but never go to their site for any reason and let everyone I know not to go there.
Reminds me of the LA Times. Used to go to their site daily but once they came down on FR, I rarely go there. Maybe once a year at the most.
16
posted on
05/09/2013 12:43:24 PM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
To: Jim Robinson
It’s really a shame that none of the defendants who settled with them are able to have their fraudulently stolen money returned to them. I know of at least three websites that settled with them for undisclosed amounts. One of them was truly a tiny kitchen-table business, and I don’t know how she survived it.
17
posted on
05/09/2013 12:45:57 PM PDT
by
lonevoice
(Today I broke my personal record for most consecutive days lived)
To: Jim Robinson
You know you’re on shaky ground when even the 9th Circus wont even agree with your case. Court turned their attempted sueage into sewage.
18
posted on
05/09/2013 12:47:05 PM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
To: Jim Robinson
19
posted on
05/09/2013 12:48:28 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: henkster
No, but we’ve learned that copyright trolls have no standing to sue us. We should be ok with excerpt and link.
20
posted on
05/09/2013 12:49:23 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson