[MrB]

Your post is a classic example of “assuming the consequent” - you interpret the evidence through an assumption, then say that the evidence proves that assumption.

You probably don’t even see that you’re doing that.

[BroJoeK]

MrB: "Your post is a classic example of “assuming the consequent” - you interpret the evidence through an assumption, then say that the evidence proves that assumption."

Your post is a classic example of psychological projection -- you assert in others what you fear most in yourself.

The fact of both your examples is: there's no -- zero, zip, nada -- valid scientific data to justify "young earthers' " claims, period.

MrB: "You probably don’t even see that you’re doing that."

You probably don’t even see that you’re doing that, FRiend.

;-)