"Raw" pictures from the Belgian paper, de Standaard, are
here.
To: markomalley
Why don’t they try this with Muslims? If they did I (might) have more respect for them...maybe.
2 posted on
04/25/2013 4:15:47 AM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
(Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
To: markomalley
Looks like paint, not water. Oh, and the angry lesbians (yes, redundant) are GUILTY.
To: markomalley
Slide 15. I’m not sure I would be doing that considering where that container may have been.
To: markomalley
The Rooskies incarcerate their blasphemous attention whores, the Europeans expel them from the venue, and the U.S. government puts them on taxpayer-funded welfare.
To: markomalley
Wow!!!!!!
That was ugly. No wonder those broads are lesbians.Only another ugly broad would want sex with any of them. They wouldn’t even get prettier at closing time.
The Bishop handled himself with dignity while they made fools of themselves.
6 posted on
04/25/2013 4:43:28 AM PDT by
Venturer
To: markomalley
Look for more attackst to happen against the Church. Not surprised.
8 posted on
04/25/2013 4:50:12 AM PDT by
Biggirl
("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
To: markomalley
composed and apparently at prayer Or composed and counting backward from 100 ;-).
9 posted on
04/25/2013 4:51:18 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
("I think amnesty is deader than a Chechen bomber." ~ LS)
To: markomalley
D u u u u d e !
The chick [term used loosely] with the sign is in dire need of +situps / -twinkies
Absent the concept of 'gentleman', many females would need to recalibrate 180°
10 posted on
04/25/2013 4:53:38 AM PDT by
tomkat
( nationalis caterva fornicari in processus)
To: markomalley
11 posted on
04/25/2013 4:56:37 AM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
To: markomalley; Venturer
The most amazing thing is that picture 4 totally captures the sheer hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance on the left.
It shows a woman throwing an unknown substance all over a bishop's body.....
.... while the second woman holds a sign that proclaims "MY BODY, MY RULES".
So apparantly it is "MY BODY, MY RULES; THE BISHOP'S BODY, *ALSO* MY RULES."
12 posted on
04/25/2013 4:59:21 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
("AP" clearly stands for American Pravda. Our news media has become completely and proudly Soviet.)
To: markomalley
It's apparent these women have chosen to live their lives contrary to church teaching. They are free to do do.
Considering the church has no power to compel these women to accept her edicts, why the rage?
15 posted on
04/25/2013 5:09:20 AM PDT by
Oratam
To: markomalley
In contrast to the protester that strutted her stuff to Putin (leading him to obviously think “Nice hooters”), these four are just skanks.
What’s the use of having semi-naked females if they aren’t even worth looking at?
16 posted on
04/25/2013 5:15:11 AM PDT by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: markomalley
This interests me none. I just clicked on it to see a boob.
Thats what these hippie chicks can take away from this...
that 90% of people looked to see a boob....
analyze the boob... (hmm, not to saggy, well proportioned, not bad, I give her a 7.)
Then 5 seconds after closing the article completely forget about it forever.
19 posted on
04/25/2013 5:55:26 AM PDT by
envisio
(Its on like Donkey Kong!)
To: markomalley
“...as they accused him of homophobia.”
Gee, looking at those pictures, why would ANYONE fear unstable homsexuals who are looking to physically and verbally assault you.
Makes NO sense, right?
24 posted on
04/25/2013 7:40:15 AM PDT by
bolobaby
To: markomalley
Did anyone ever ask them why when they are protesting in Russia, Germany, France or Belgium they all write on themselves in English?
27 posted on
04/25/2013 7:47:19 AM PDT by
Pan_Yan
(I believe in God. All else is dubious.)
To: markomalley
They remind me of Act Up.
29 posted on
04/25/2013 7:57:25 AM PDT by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson