Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Singles swing into retirement with little savings
Maket Watch ^ | April 18, 2013 | Robert Powell

Posted on 04/18/2013 1:32:55 PM PDT by Hojczyk

If you think it’s hard saving for retirement as a couple, trying doing it as a single. According to a study—described by one expert as the most intriguing of 2012—the amount of money singles in their late 60s have saved up for retirement is dramatically less than that of married-couple households.

In fact, the median married household had in 2008 nearly 10 times more saved up for retirement than the median single-person household, $111,600 vs. $12,500. (Savings, for the record, included 401(k)s and IRAs and all taxable savings and investment accounts, but it did not include Social Security, pensions, or housing wealth. And single, at least for the purpose of this research could mean divorced, widowed or unmarried for most/all of their life.)

So what lessons can be drawn from the findings? In general, if you’re single you’ll need to accumulate much more in your nest egg than your married counterparts, according to Utkus.

Plus, you need to make sure you have the right kinds of insurance in place. “You need also to protect against large, unexpected claims,” he wrote. And that means, having disability, life, and health insurance. “The new health care act may help when you lose workplace coverage—but of course you’ll still need to buy a policy,” he wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: babyboomers; retirement; seniors; singles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 04/18/2013 1:32:55 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“So what lessons can be drawn from the findings? In general, if you’re single you’ll need to accumulate much more in your nest egg than your married counterparts...”

Or, just vote for a Democrat.


2 posted on 04/18/2013 1:35:36 PM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

a study—described by one expert as the most intriguing

A fool could figure this out... TWO People working


3 posted on 04/18/2013 1:36:43 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

If a couple has only saved 125K by their late 60’s they must have been living way above their means for a long time


4 posted on 04/18/2013 1:37:05 PM PDT by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

Voting democrat is short-term thinking but results in long-term misery.


5 posted on 04/18/2013 1:38:23 PM PDT by 353FMG ( I do not indicate whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

WHAT GOOD IS A NEST EGHG THAT EARNS LESS THAN 1% INTEREST.

You will eat up the principle in 3 years and be on welfare after you sell your house to a reverse mortgager.


6 posted on 04/18/2013 1:38:58 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Duke Power stock pays a 4.5% dividend as does AT&T and AEP.


7 posted on 04/18/2013 1:39:50 PM PDT by AppyPappy (You never see a massacre at a gun show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Plus, you need to make sure you have the right kinds of insurance in place. “You need also to protect against large, unexpected claims,” he wrote. And that means, having disability, life, and health insurance.

If you are single, what do you need a life insurance policy for? To settle any outstanding debts? AD&D (dismemberment without death)?

8 posted on 04/18/2013 1:40:47 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Who cares? If you scream loud enough, the government will give you more subsidies — food stamps, free medical, free transportation. And they’ll pressure your bank to let you stay in your house without paying the mortgage if you still have one. And how will Uncle Sam pay for it? By confiscating the 401Ks of those poor suckers who actually did save for retirement. “Ant and Grasshopper” in reverse.


9 posted on 04/18/2013 1:41:35 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
No problem, Obama's Death Panels will take care of this.

You may be able to settle your debt to the government if you have organs healthy enough to be harvested.

10 posted on 04/18/2013 1:45:07 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

In addition, why save - say - a half million dollars if that will only last you a year or two in the future economic collapse.

And don’t think that Obama and the libs weren’t paying attention to the money grab in Cyprus.

Its called redistribution. And thats been a part of Obama’s agenda since forever.


11 posted on 04/18/2013 1:45:27 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2

or they put all their savings into their home which was excluded from this.


12 posted on 04/18/2013 1:53:09 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

The low, low interest rates have not helped savings accounts.

15 years ago a money market account was earning a ‘low-moderate’ 8%.

8 years ago I put some of my savings into CD’s. They were only earning 5%. On renewal, 4%. Next renewal 3%. Next renewal was 1%, which was less than my money market was earning, so I returned the funds to the money market.

Currently, that money market is earning 0.75%.

==

I have noticed recently that my weekly grocery bill is running between $50 and $60. About 4 years ago, it was between $30 and $45. And 4 years before than, it was running about $25 to $30.

==

Right now, the government is benefitting greatly from the low interest due to the size of the National Debt.

Those low rates are unsustainable. SuperInflation and rising interest rates will happen. When they do, prices will skyrocket.


13 posted on 04/18/2013 1:56:05 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
It is damn hard for me to understand how single people can save less money than married people. I probably saved about 40 cents of every dollar I took home when I was single. I'm lucky if I can save 5 cents of every dollar since.

And that considers fairly substantial salary increases because I had the luxury of working jobs which didn't pay very well but were fun when I was single.

14 posted on 04/18/2013 2:00:19 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
It is damn hard for me to understand how single people can save less money than married people. I probably saved about 40 cents of every dollar I took home when I was single. I'm lucky if I can save 5 cents of every dollar since.

And that considers fairly substantial salary increases because I had the luxury of working jobs which didn't pay very well but were fun when I was single.

15 posted on 04/18/2013 2:00:35 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Depends. One person supporting 2-5 people and then saving for retirement to support two people in retirement is harder than one single saving for retirement.


16 posted on 04/18/2013 2:00:41 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I tell my kids all the time God created the concept of family for a reason - it is the best social, medical, old-age, welfare and retirement insurance that exists, or will ever exist.


17 posted on 04/18/2013 2:06:45 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Depends. One person supporting 2-5 people and then saving for retirement to support two people in retirement is harder than one single saving for retirement.


18 posted on 04/18/2013 2:19:14 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Is this why queers want to marry? Will it instantaneously make them financially responsible? Inquiring minds want to know.


19 posted on 04/18/2013 2:35:57 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (The Team: Progressives, Margret Sanger, Josef Mengele and the Butcher of Philadelphia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Who has money for retirement? The govt and Obama has taken it all. They find out you have an extra $10.00 laying around they pass another stupid bill or law to take it away from you.


20 posted on 04/18/2013 2:37:10 PM PDT by coconut47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson