[Perseverando]

Stick to your guns, Freepers!! Keep the pressure on the politicians. Don't let them get away with their lies.

[gdani]

While I appreciate the intent, these laws are next to useless.

Like it or not, federal law reigns supreme.

[cripplecreek]

[Mr. K]

Why pass only only protecting 2nd ammendment? Why not all of them.

Then you can refuse to implement Obamacare too...

[petro45acp]

Admitting to not reading the whole article, but.....

Isn’t there already a law on the books that renders ALL federal and state firearms laws null and void?

Though that was what the Second Amendment was about.....

...we now return you to your regularly scheduled broadcast...

K Y P D !!!!

[Monorprise]

Obama has underestimated the strength of our resolve about our guns. We will not be giving them up, no matter what they say or do.

[Mat_Helm]

NOW NRA COME HELP US OUT IN CALIFORNIA DEFEAT ALL THESE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS!!!!!!!

[MasterGunner01]

This being the case, the the governor gives all Feds 30 days to leave the state. After that, the State Police will arrest these alphabet agency a**holes, bus them to the state line, and dump them. Alternatively, if there's an Amtrak train coming through, put ‘em on the train and escort the train out of state.

When the Feds cutoff funds to the state, cutoff all monies sent from the state to Washington, DC. Screw the Feds.

[Still Thinking]

Montana began the trend with its Firearms Freedom Act. The law is currently tied up in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard arguments last month. The Cato and Goldwater Institutes have filed a friend-of-the-court brief, “arguing that federal law doesn’t preempt Montana’s ability to exercise its sovereign police powers to facilitate the exercise of individual rights protected by the

Riiiiight, because a federal court ruling on the limits of federal powers MUST be right, right? [eyeroll] I mean, I'd still show up for arguments because if lightning strikes and they rule in your favor, it's a powerful precedent, but if they rule against you [shrug]? That's kind of missing the point, isn't it? To let the feds define the limits of federalism?