Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

IMHO, they refused to decide whether "may issue" is arbitrary. It's a sad day.
1 posted on 04/15/2013 11:36:28 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

How would the Left handle any restrictions on their illusory “right” to prenatal infanticide?

Demonstrations day and night.

Picketing.

Endless phone calls.

The media would be frantic.

Huffington Post would be in full dudgeon.


2 posted on 04/15/2013 11:40:16 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Living in New York should be “proper cause” in and of itself.


3 posted on 04/15/2013 11:40:43 AM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Another toll from the bell sounding the end of the Republic. This is truly a sad thing. Our SC is a majority socialist now.


4 posted on 04/15/2013 11:56:04 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
“Our review of the history and tradition of firearm regulation does not ‘clearly demonstrate’ that limiting handgun possession in public to those who show a special need for self-protection is inconsistent with the Second Amendment,” Judge Richard C. Wesley wrote in the November opinion.

Stubbornly wrongheaded. Treasonous even. It is clearly unconstitutional in itself. And any judge who doesn't comprehend that needs to be removed from the bench. The part about history and tradition only demonstrates that previous generations of judges had agendas other than upholding the Constitution and therefore should be no guide for us or the SCOTUS today.

5 posted on 04/15/2013 12:03:47 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Selective review/handling of the Tenth Amendment? A moderate/liberal majority ruling, to include Justice Kennedy?


6 posted on 04/15/2013 12:03:48 PM PDT by izzatzo (NO MORE BUSHES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

How does the Supreme court decide to accept a case? Is this done by majority vote or is it decided by the Chief Justice?


7 posted on 04/15/2013 12:13:55 PM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This way they don’t expose themselves to criticism for going through contortions to support the liberal position as happened with Chief Justice John Roberts in the Obamacare decision.


8 posted on 04/15/2013 12:29:30 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Welcome to Obama-Land - EVERYTHING NOT FORBIDDEN IS COMPULSORY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Illinois residents are so screwed because of this ruling.
The Illinois Legislature is considering restricting “where” you can’t carry.
Now they will restrict “who” can carry.


9 posted on 04/15/2013 12:34:33 PM PDT by stylin19a (obama - Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

At least we may take comfort in the fact that in a generation or so when war comes, we shall have a somewhat significant arms & arms industry advantage over the leftist northeast. This should be nice to add to our food & energy supply advantage.

Its simply a matter of redirecting our industry to work with each other in isolation from the north and we will be ready to wage war for the restoration of liberty.

Our main problem however is time and education. Our children must know what it is to be free if they are to have any hope of remaining free.


10 posted on 04/15/2013 1:04:13 PM PDT by Monorprise (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

At least we may take comfort in the fact that in a generation or so when war comes, we shall have a somewhat significant arms & arms industry advantage over the leftist northeast. This should be nice to add to our food & energy supply advantage.

Its simply a matter of redirecting our industry to work with each other in isolation from the north and we will be ready to wage war for the restoration of liberty.

Our main problem however is time and education. Our children must know what it is to be free if they are to have any hope of remaining free.


11 posted on 04/15/2013 1:05:00 PM PDT by Monorprise (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

SCOTUS to NY:DROP DEAD


13 posted on 04/15/2013 1:15:19 PM PDT by FatherFig1o155 (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

After their ruling on Obamacare, I wouldn’t trust their views on anything anymore.


16 posted on 04/15/2013 1:59:12 PM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“Every day, my office fights to ensure all New Yorkers are safe and secure in their communities,”

By stripping them of their constitutional rights.


18 posted on 04/15/2013 3:27:54 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The supreme court is set up so that individual “justices” handle cases from their assigned districts...

question is, which justice turned down this case?????

inquiring minds want to know....


19 posted on 04/15/2013 3:57:14 PM PDT by joe fonebone (The clueless... they walk among us, and they vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I know we are conservative and supposed to support the USSC but when will we all smell the coffee?

5-4, 5-4, 5-4..... Ad infinitum, of “decisions” and worst of all refusals to even hear a case which affects directly “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” should tell anyone with a functioning brain that the USSC is nothing but a bunch of political hacks doing the bidding of an out of constitutional bounds government.

Our lying politicians on both sides of the aisle (really just one side some leaning left others leaning because they have no spine) tell us these are the brightest legal minds and belong on the USSC bench.

BULL Excrement! If they are so fricken bright how come they cannot agree on a rather simple document? The US Constitution is certainly simple in today’s world of thousand page laws.

The USSC is the one of the two parts of the foundation of the country where our Founders failed us.

The Founders could have never anticipated judges who reached this level would be so politically corrupt as to destroy the country and the Constitution.

The second failure was “Freedom of the Press” as they thought competition would keep the press honest ENOUGH to expose any excesses of the government.


22 posted on 04/16/2013 6:04:31 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

[[Supreme Court won’t hear New York gun law challenge]]

Of course they own’t because it’s a constitutional issue, and as we nkow, the traitor john roberts has stated that it’;s not the supreme court’s job to ‘protect the american from their bad choices’ - essentialy givign current pres and any state the right to vioalte our constitutional rights- our last lien of defence agaisnt a tyranical governemnt was systematically undermiend by an activist judge


26 posted on 04/16/2013 9:36:55 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Disgusting.


29 posted on 04/16/2013 9:43:33 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson