From Dehumanizing Word Games to Gosnell (how did America get to letting babies die?)

National Review ^ | 04/13/2013 | Andrew McCarthy

[Alberta's Child]

The mainstream media has a vested interest in suppressing this story. The one thing they can never allow to get out about the Gosnell case is not the grisly nature of his crimes, but the fact that the entire purpose of legalized abortion is to have people like Gosnell do exactly what he was doing: killing black infants (without regard to whether it was done before or after they were "born") as a eugenics measure.

Gosnell isn't a criminal, folks ... he's a paid executioner for the state.

[Blue Collar Christian]

By re-defining terms. Now we have a completely fabricated false morality: political correctness, which, of course, condemns those that still call conveniently terminating a pregnancy, murder, as the offender.

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

[beaversmom]

Audio: Obama argues against Born Alive legislation in IL state senate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YUkbuhXzbvI#!

[neverdem]

...step by step....one compromise at a time.

The RINO way...

[Fzob]

Grand jury Report found here

http://www.phila.gov/districtattorney/pdfs/grandjurywomensmedical.pdf

[Cronos]

America is heading towards Stalinism at the exact time when former socialist countries like China and India are embracing capitalism.

I prefer a break-up of the country -- let New England and Californica and Washington break away to form liberalistan.

[Elsie]

Are you still killing your unborn?

-- GOD

 

[Elsie]

Great AMERICAN Values!!!

I'd like to thank the United States Government for protecting me and my kind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, 40 years ago, my odds of making it out of the egg, alive, were very poor; about 80% of us died. 

 (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rachel-carson-silent-spring-1972-ddt-ban-birds-thrive)

 

 

But a lady discovered our plight and wrote a book that addressed our problem,

and, in 1972, a law was ammended protecting us even further. (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)

 

 

 

 

 

 

What I find strange is that the same government passed a law the very next year that allowed for killing

of unborn, and apparently unwanted, humans.  Little ones still nestled safely in their Mother's womb.

Around 25% of them are dying before birth - on average nearly 3,300 - every day of the year.

 

 

I hear that by now, somewhere around 55 MILLION of them have perished.

Wouldn't that kind of mess up the humans plans for growth, and welfare, and

retirement?

 

 

 

 

 

Strange birds; these Homo Sapiens.  Perhaps they'll come to their senses

before they are ALL dead!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Elsie]

Symbolism over Substance!!!

[PapaBear3625]

Over at Belmont Club, former freeper Richard Fernandez makes a good point:

Though 3801 Lancaster Street seemed to stand on a major Philadelphia street in the apparent blaze of day its doorways were really guarded by a spell that guaranteed that no one inquired into what happened within because everyone knew what was happening already. A knowledge not only that infanticide was practiced within but that most of us, in small or big ways, had tacitly given our imprimatur to it.

For the House guarded one secret that has not been touched upon in the cultural debate. That the real purpose of abortion is to make it impossible, once we have acceded to it, to object to anything else.

To understand 3801 Lancaster street maybe we should go back to Moloch rather than to the system of industrial execution that flourished 70 years ago. “Child sacrifice — “the ritualistic killing of children in order to please, propitiate or force a god or supernatural beings” was long practiced by the Incas, Aztec, many cultures in the Middle East, North Africa and in pagan Europe. The question is: why? What was its purpose that Moloch should be worshiped thus in his many names?

One theory is that child sacrifice was a sacramental device used to kill what we used to call “God” Himself. Moloch’s problem was how to get everyone to belong to him and to no other. His answer was to arrange a radical crossing over, an extreme commitment, a journey beyond the pale so shocking that to embark upon it was to go beyond point of no return. There was no going back to God after that. And once you had offered your child to Moloch there was no point refusing him anything else.

Killing your own child – just as acquiescing to killing the Jews was to the German public — was a form of enlistment by complicity. It is the last and most decisive step in the extinction of freedom. Though apparently practiced upon the child the real target of abasement is the mother. And by extension it is all of us. That is the shame the conservative pundits felt. Not the shame of sexual guilt. It is the shame of having gone along. By consenting to be an accomplice in the destruction of her own child she binds herself mystically to the doctrine of Moloch. “You are nothing but meat. So take this child and eat. Do this in memory of you.”

[thirst4truth]

That was a hard one to take. What kind of human being can do this or watch this or read this and not cry for these little ones. You know this has got to be bothering alot of people, as it is a purposeful blackout on the network news.