Posted on 04/11/2013 11:52:23 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
When it comes to his handling of the raging gun-control debate, at least, President Obama's approval rate has been dipping --- and Sen. Ted Cruz is thinking that the president's relentless, brazen demagoguery on the issue is probably doing the Democrats more harm than good. More gun control from the federal government isn't exactly going to help red-state Democratic incumbents maintain their seats, after all. Via The Hill:
“I think the president has shown he is willing to demagogue an issue and that it is ultimately going to backfire,” Cruz said in an interview on Laura Ingraham’s radio show. …
“In fact, in my view, as a result of their onslaught on the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, I think there’s going to be a very significant consequence in 2014,” Cruz added. “I think as a result of this fight that President Obama is picking, I think the stage is set for Republicans to take control of the United States Senate because of this fight right now, because of coming after the right to keep and bear arms of peaceful law-abiding Americans. I think a number of red state Democrats who are up for reelection in 2014 are going to lose their seats and I think they should.”
It definitely looks like the Second Amendment is going to be playing a revamped role in the upcoming midterms — a potential problem there being that the best way to make that happen might be to force said red-state Democrats to go on the record with a vote, and Sen. Cruz and others have said that they’ll “oppose the motion to proceed to any legislation that will serve as a vehicle for any additional gun restrictions.” As assuredly epic as another #StandWithRand-type filibuster would be, Allahpundit pointed out yesterday that the even more strategic move for the GOP might be letting the Democratic caucus squirm over those hard votes. The WSJ, for their part, wasn’t pleased about the prospect of a filibuster on the issue:
In an instant, these GOP wizards have taken the onus off Senate Democrats and made Republicans the media’s gun-control focus. Mr. Reid is now bellowing about Republicans blocking a vote, and Democrats such as Mark Pryor (Arkansas), Mary Landrieu (Louisiana) and Mark Begich (Alaska) don’t have to declare themselves on provisions that might be unpopular at home.
Meanwhile, Mr. Obama can retreat to his favorite pose of portraying Republicans as obstructionists, which pressures GOP moderates like Maine Senator Susan Collins. “And yet, some folks back in Washington are already floating the idea that they may use political stunts to prevent votes on any of these reforms,” Mr. Obama said on Monday—without mentioning that the “folks” who oppose his bill are Democrats.
But Sen. Cruz stuck to his guns, promising to move forward with a filibuster on a restrictive gun-control bill (you can listen to the audio here):
“I think the criticism has been silly,” Cruz said before adding that “the Republicans who are saying that they are happy to vote to shutoff debate and move to the bill, they don’t even know what the bill contains.
“The bill that these Republicans are going on television saying ‘we’ve got to move to and vote on,’ they still don’t know the details because the Democrats haven’t released the details of the bill that they’re moving to proceed to.”
Whichever way it happens, the Senate is scheduled to start moving on the issue on Thursday. It's going down.
No it won't.
It had better, or I’m afraid the pushback to the libtards will be a slightly non-constitutional manner.
Countered by GOPe cowardice in the face of the Democrats’ attempt to stomp on the Constitution once again.
It is going to cost a few RINOs as well.
I hope he is right.
This is what I sent to the traitor Toomey:
“Senator Toomey, I was shocked and deeply disappointed to learn that you had made a ‘deal’ with Senator Manchin to advance the left-wing Democratic agenda to chip away at the Second Amendment. I am a lifelong conservative Republican. As such, I at least welcome the likes of Senator Casey—you know what you are getting with him and those who think like him. What I find repugnant is a member of Congress who professes to be conservative, then hauls off and joins those who are gleefully shredding the Constitution.
Apparently we didn’t vet you sufficiently after you announced your candidacy. I won’t be voting for you again, and I welcome the search for a primary candidate who is a real conservative.”
If they can steal a major presidential election and get away with it, you know they will steal the smaller scale elections.
I wish the republicans position was that this is a STATE issue not federal and that STATE which already has some of the more restrictive laws needs to review what it did wrong.
When the repubs begin to even discuss issues as being fed they lose.
I love this guy. We need more like him
More likely it’ll cost a few gophers their seats.
Gun control OUGHT to cost the ‘Rats the Senate.
The only problem is, their opponents will (still) be the Republicans. And the Republicans have two small problems that will get in the way:
1) They themselves don’t stand for a damn thing, and
2) They couldn’t find their asses with both hands.
Other than that...
C'mon man how many conservatives supported Bush in his constitution work-around to avoid a formal declaration of war. Obama is doing the same thing. No difference. Let me know when conservatives support ALL the constitution regardless of who is President.
We’d better have a whole lot of fraud watchers in the 2014 election. The collectivists are running the vote handling and counting.
However it is very possible that the implosion of Obamacare may have the same effect.
All the bad stuff was timed to hit after Baraq’s re-election, but watch out by 2014.
Not if they can take away people’s guns. They do that and elections become irrelevant.
Neah.
By election time 2014, it will be out of the news and forgotten, or the Democrats (with accomplices in the media) will have transferred the blame to the ‘Pubbies.
I, for one, am already blaming one ‘Pubby, Johnny Isakson. I will never again vote for him again.
It's a bit early; I'd like to hear a lot more from him ... but I like the possibility of having a committed, determined, enthusiastic conservative running for Senate here.
If people had any sense it’d cost them seats at every level of government. The Democrat Party as presently constituted can’t be trusted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.