Posted on 04/09/2013 10:31:07 AM PDT by Yooperman
Mark Levin last night said he dosen't like to use the word Marxist.
Rush Limbaugh another Obama enabler: Moralmatters.org reader says Limbaugh is a political prostitute April 5, 2013
Limbaugh talks big, but falls short in conveying the reality about Obama. He, like Hannity, Levin, Laura Ingraham and a host of (so-called) “Conservative” talk show hosts continue to whine and wring their hands over Obama’s political actions and agenda. But, when it comes down to brass tacks, these self-proclaimed “Conservatives,” fall woefully short. They will not expose Obama for his identity frauds and forgeries, even though now, it has been legally evidenced that Obama’s (needed and required) documentation for the office of president has been found to be (felony) fraudulent. Incidentally, this web author finds it hypocritical on the part of some of these so-called “Conservative” talk show hosts that they advertise a show sponsor service source of prevention for identity theft fraud for rank-in-file Americans; yet, these same (hypocritical) talk show hosts go out of their way to ignore Obama’s ID fraud and forgeries.
http://moralmatters.org/2013/04/05/rush-limbaugh-another-obama-enabler-moralmatters-org-reader-says-limbaugh-is-a-political-prostitute/
(Excerpt) Read more at moralmatters.org ...
OMG! If you knew this definition WHERE WERE YOU before Obama was elected in 2008? Nobody seemed conversant with the two citizen parent AND born in the USA definition here on FR until after the election.
And the Constitution mentions only three types of US citizens. Naturalized, natural born, and a citizen at the time of adoption of the constitution.
It’s even worse than that: He was mentored by an avowed communist, he is following the recommended actions found in Sual Alinsky’s book to destroy this Country.
Holy Smokes!
What a strange photo! Is that a phone booth that guy’s talking in?
Haven’t had a double zot in quite some time now. ;-)
Sure looks like it. :) Thank Heaven for small favors.
Wouldn’t you be calling someone if a giant cat were eating your car and those inside it?
One thing’s for sure, it’s a Viking Kitty, and that must be a bad man.
Spot on post!
Got a heck of a chuckle from the "Hillary thigh gap" analogy too.
Prayers for your Mom HG.
The guy on the payphone appears to be from the car not being eaten. It took me a bit to realize what that contraption he’s talking on is.
I've seen "Pastor Emeritus" Nathan Bickle post before at ORYR (ObamaReleaseYourRecords) in the past. I considered him a concern troll there, and as far back as two years ago.
Thanks for the Ping, TOL.
Before Obama was elected I, and I believe many others took for granted that what was taught in grade schools,high schools, and colleges about the history of the USA and It’s Constitution. There was little concern and/or effort to deal with usurpation of the Foundation of this Nation or the meaning and purpose behind the ‘Declaration of Independence’ which was the prologue for the Constitution. Before and after WWII citizens by/of various classes were very busy not only building this Nation but in providing for their own family welfare. At sometime in our history, I would say after the early 1960s, these hard working citizens of different classes had enriched the Nation to the point where sweat and hard work was ,by many/too many persons, replaced with desire for ‘change’. There were many people who were concerned with ‘change’ as proposed by Obama. There were quite a number even looking at Obama and warning about what he was talking about. There was little concern about his eligibility for being a Senator even though Chicago politics was involved. However, there were people already looking at his eligibility for POTUS. It was taken for granted at the time that Obama was an ordinary citizen spoken about in Article I of the Constitution. It was at this point that the Obama enablers really came into play insofar as to obfuscate, doctor, and create the phantom background for Obama with the help of bought news organizations. So it was that growing public awareness, and also some public denial, was what turned to a serious interest in what the Constitution requires as to eligibility for POTUSA. I believe that today there are many people who have now become conversant about the wording and intent of the Constitution.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
I see. Well, who says they weren’t carpooling somewhere? ;-)
My pleasure, friend.
So why do you suppose there wasn’t a single poster on FR conversant with the Vattel definition until after Obama’s election? If this was what so many NOW claim they were taught in school? Where are the textbooks they were taught from that advance this definition?
And the citizen qualification discussed in Article one is inclusive of all three types of US citizen mentioned in the Constitution. It is not its own category. As should be obvious.
Nobody, with the possible exception of me, of course; is right about every issue, every time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.