Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin: Obama trying to nationalize election process
The Right Scoop ^ | 3/28/13 | The Right Scoop

Posted on 03/28/2013 8:59:51 PM PDT by Nachum

Mark Levin opened his show tonight discussing Obama’s new executive order to create an election commission to study problems that Obama says exist on the local and state level, like people standing in line too long in waiting to vote. But Levin wants to know where the evidence exists to substantiate these so-called problems. In fact, he believes that Obama is trying to nationalize the election process so the federal government will have more control over it.

Here’s an short excerpt:

In the ratification debates in the states, after the Constitutional Convention ended, after they sent draft copies of the Constitution to the states to ratify, there was much debate in the states over this issue. And some of the anti-federalists who opposed the Constitution were very, very concerned that the federal government would interfere with state election laws. And they felt if the federal government did that, the federal, central government would have control over the election process and use it to its benefit.

(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; election; election2014; election2016; electionfraud; levin; levinlive; marklevin; nationalize; obama; obamaelectionreform; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Nachum

Well, Obama cheated and won the 2012 elections nationwide and Romney didn’t put up much of a fight considering some district had 100%+ of registered voters vote.

This is so 2014 won’t fall to the Pubs...sealing Michelle’s bid for 2016.

Man, even when I sort of joke, it sends shivers down my spine.


21 posted on 03/29/2013 7:33:20 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
my understanding comes from a documentary on the rise and fall of Nazi Germany as it portrayed Hitler as being philosophically conservative due to his staunch belief in pro industry growth for the people who in turn supported his rise on that basis. If I'm not mistaken, the Nazi Party became the dominant party of Germany and was initially accepted as being of conservative bent. That philosophical belief had to do with that window of time of Hitler's life and how he sold himself to the German people. Obviously history proves it was all a lie, kind of like what we see going on today in DC.
22 posted on 03/29/2013 8:02:56 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Nachum.
23 posted on 03/29/2013 8:09:05 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The line I was in was not long at all. This was most likely due to the ballot boxes being pre stuffed with fake ballots.


24 posted on 03/29/2013 12:17:15 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Self ping


25 posted on 03/29/2013 11:31:58 PM PDT by ru4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

“his staunch belief in pro industry growth”

The Bolsheviks promised industrial miracles, too. Hitler may have been funded in part by Big Business, but there is no necessary connection between it and “conservatism.” They’re don’t even reliably defend the status quo. Those to the left of Hitler would have you believe Big Business equals rightism, and they’d be correct from their perspective. Because everyone is to the right of them, Hitler included. But this fantasy both have that they are polar opposites of eachother is no sense.

Here’s the straight dope. Nazis and commies hated eachother so fiercely because they were after the same constituency. Those who went Nazi when the Nazis rose to power were those who had previously voted leftist. It never was a lie; the German equivalent of Wall Street wasn’t hoodwinked. It was right there in the name: national socialism. You might as well say the real Wall Street was betrayed by Bush the Younger when he abandoned free market principles to save the free market, or however he put it. Then you’d hafta believe Wall Street stands for the free market. But who ever told you that? Probably someone just to the left of Big Business with a bone to pick.

International finance capital funded the Bolsheviks, too, by the way. But that’s a whole other story.


26 posted on 04/01/2013 12:01:03 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Propaganda works. We did not, are not getting and never will get the real history of why politically fractured societies eventually lead to war as long as the international banksters, who are the sole beneficiaries of war, are allowed to rule the world as well as owning the MSM. Thank you for your input.


27 posted on 04/01/2013 12:24:40 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson