Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Sodomy: We All Have To Pay!’ Coulter Debate On ‘Nannying’ Devolves Into Battle Over Gay Bathhouses
Mediaite ^ | 3-23-2013 | Andrew Kirell

Posted on 03/24/2013 3:29:50 PM PDT by smoothsailing

March 23, 2013

‘Sodomy: We All Have To Pay!’ Coulter Debate On ‘Nannying’ Devolves Into Battle Over Gay Bathhouses

Andrew Kirell

This might be perhaps the greatest segment of Geraldo at Large ever known to man. During what was supposed to be a debate about NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg‘s various “public health” laws — indoor smoking bans, hidden cigarette displays by mandate, bans on large sugary beverages, etc. — Ann Coulter attempted to flip the “liberal nannying” logic upside-down by bringing up illegitimacy, sodomy, AIDS, and gay bathhouses.

Suffice it to say the segment went off the rails. And did so quickly.

Anti-obesity advocate (and big Bloomberg fan) MeMe Roth started off praising the mayor’s various efforts by noting that he is a “student of behavioral psychology” who understands that “increasing the inconvenience just a little bit” will lead to better choices by the consumer.

Coulter was not having any of it. She tore into Bloomberg by suggesting we just be done with it already and “have a death penalty for smokers,” before changing the subject to the negative behaviors that liberals are unwilling to stigmatize, such as illegitimate birth.

Geraldo Rivera‘s efforts to corral the segment away from unwed teen pregnancy were for naught. When Roth made the claim that bans on various unhealthy activities are warranted because “we pick up the tab” for other’s bad habits, Coulter countered that “I think you’re going to have to do something about the gay bathhouses.” .....

(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; bathhouses; bloomberg; coulter; gay; geraldo; homosexualagenda; mayorbloomberg; moralabsolutes; nannystate; smoking; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

RETRO COULTER!!!


1 posted on 03/24/2013 3:29:50 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
When Roth made the claim that bans on various unhealthy activities are warranted because “we pick up the tab” for other’s bad habits, Coulter countered that “I think you’re going to have to do something about the gay bathhouses.” .....

The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality

2 posted on 03/24/2013 3:35:52 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Smoking, salt, fatty foods, soda and fried foods are bad for your health.

But what’s a little bacteria among ‘friends’, eh?;)

The liberal playbook, an incomprehensible puzzle of hypocrisy and stupidity.


3 posted on 03/24/2013 3:37:07 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The progtard Whorealdo had on was beyond annoying and would not accept how idiotic her argument was. As much as I think Coulter makes a fool of herself often, and has indefensible love-affairs with people like Krispy Kreme, she nailed this one.


4 posted on 03/24/2013 3:41:42 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

5 posted on 03/24/2013 3:44:11 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, IÂ’m a conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Good strategy, Me Me Roth claims she want people to bear the cost of their actions, but liberalism depends on people diverting the costs of their behavior onto others. Coulter was right to hit them like this.


6 posted on 03/24/2013 3:46:51 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

This reminded me of the Coulter I liked years ago when I was reading her early columns and books. As you say, she nailed this one.


7 posted on 03/24/2013 3:48:58 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Damn I love that woman!!


8 posted on 03/24/2013 3:56:13 PM PDT by white trash redneck (Just one of B. Hussein Obama's "typical white people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Great point.

9 posted on 03/24/2013 3:57:09 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income,tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

That’s a keeper! :)


10 posted on 03/24/2013 3:57:29 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
Linus should have responded.

"I'm male and males, even if they are the father, aren't allowed to be involved in choosing life or death for their babies."

11 posted on 03/24/2013 3:58:11 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Don't assume Shahanshah Obama will allow another election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The Sex Positive Agenda will not be challenged. They seek to end all moral (and rational) judgments against any sexual activity regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s). And it is advocated by academia and medical professionals. Whether it is through sites like Go Ask Alice or “sex week” teach-ins or the Massachusetts public schools system, or...


12 posted on 03/24/2013 4:05:26 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

I wouldn’t be surprised if Meme Roth would support the death penalty for overweight people, but for choosing a lifestyle that leads to intractable diseases, horrific death, increased suicides, and pederasty as a means of reproduction — HEY! That is just fine with her.


13 posted on 03/24/2013 4:06:56 PM PDT by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
I have postulated for years that the real reason for Obamacare is so everyone can pick up the tab for AIDS drugs for homosexuals (not to mention whatever other medical bills they run up). Judging by the undue influence such a small segment of the population has on policy, I'd say there are a lot of homos on the Hill, either seated or staffers.

Funny how Liberals invade any other aspect of life with unwanted government intrusion, and then demand it be stopped/regulated because "we all have to pay for..."(--heck, there are FReepers who use that same argument--)instead of just stuffing the Government back in its Constitutional sized box and letting people pay for their own choices. However, when it comes down to specific Liberal activities, they just want us to pay while they play.

More hypocrisy.

14 posted on 03/24/2013 4:07:01 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
The Sex Positive Agenda will not be challenged. They seek to end all moral (and rational) judgments against any sexual activity regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s). And it is advocated by academia and medical professionals.

So true.

A Government based on the sensations in one's groin is unlikely to have good long-term prospects.

15 posted on 03/24/2013 4:11:37 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Some might not be aware that the talk show host Michael Savage became persona non-grata back in the early eighties for suggesting precisely that gay bathhouses be closed as vectors of disease transmission. At the time he was run regularly in the papers as a nutrition homeopathic health guru, but after his statement they all dropped him like a hot potato, eventually leading to his career in radio. So the road Coulter is heading down has been travelled before.


16 posted on 03/24/2013 4:15:37 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp
Several years ago i had a guy come into my house to sell me life insurance. One of the key questions he asked me was do you smoke? My wife was there at the same time and my reply was "no i do not practice homosexual behavior in any manner. I have never had a mans penis in my rectum". After i recovered from the elbow i got in the ribs i could only smile at him and ask why he did not ask me that question. HE had no answer and i told him i want an answer in order to buy insurance from him. He told he would call he main office the next day and get back to me. He never did call back.

Isn't it time insurance companies be forced by smoker to ask the question on homosexual acts? If they can ask me about smoking why not the fags to take in the .....wall you know where.

17 posted on 03/24/2013 4:17:36 PM PDT by Plumberman27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
LOL! I refuse to watch that dufus Jerry Rivers but I watched the video, it reminded me why I don't watch him.

He had a hard time controlling Ann and the Roth person suffering her liberal mental disorder, Ann did pretty good:)

18 posted on 03/24/2013 4:21:45 PM PDT by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I watched it last night because I knew Coulter was on. The looks she gave the Roth nut were classic! LOL!


19 posted on 03/24/2013 4:30:30 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Ann has been redeeming herself very recently.


20 posted on 03/24/2013 4:31:53 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson