Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Pressure Washington Redskins to Change Name
GOP USA ^ | 3/21/2013 | Bobby Eberle

Posted on 03/23/2013 6:43:30 AM PDT by IbJensen

Here we go again. Actually, it's an ongoing effect by those who embrace political correctness to the point way beyond stupidity. The Washington Redskins professional football team has been pressured by people and organizations for years who feel the use of the name "Redskins" is derogatory, offensive, insensitive, racist, and whatever other label you want to throw at it. Now, the Democrats are stepping up the attack as well.

As reported in The Hill, Democrats in the House of Representatives have introduced a bill that would "prevent the term 'Redskins' from being trademarked." Why, you ask? It's simple. These Democrats want the Washington Redskins to drop the name.

The Non-Disparagement of American Indians in Trademark Registrations Act of 2013 is co-sponsored by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), and comes days after a federal trademark panel heard arguments over whether the team name was a slur. The panel could potentially overturn the team's trademark, which would erode profits by allowing other businesses to sell apparel and goods featuring the Redskins name.

Earlier this month, Norton said the team "should consider" a new name.

“Nobody would let a comparable name to blacks stand," Norton said, adding that she thinks the team will eventually be forced to make a change.

Here's the real problem. As noted in the story, there are "renewed calls in Washington politics and media for the team to change the name." But notice, the sentence specifies "Washington politics and media." Where's the public outcry. Let's listen... All I hear are crickets. That's because this is NO outcry.

All of these PC efforts are just ridiculous. The story also points out that numerous high school teams use the Redskins name. And these are coming under attack too. But it's not from local residents. It's from legal groups and left-wing organizations who want to tell the public how to think, and force teams to change all under threat of lawsuit.

To see how ridiculous this has become, just look at the oped in The Washington Post. The headline reads, "The Redskins name is really valuable, and really offensive. Here’s how to fix it." So, he says the name isn't just offensive, but it's "really" offensive. Wow... really? The only example the author cites is from another left-wing writer. That's hardly a plethora of evidence.

If people want change, they will demand it. It's as simple as that. Let the Washington Redskins be the Redskins. Let's move on to something more important like the budget, the debt, taxes, jobs, national security, or a host of other issues that are actually important.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; leftistscum; obamateam; washredskins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: All

What can we say when the voters of Washington State elect a Prince Valiant look alike like Patty Cake Murray to represent them and the nation........

There's a reason all the Democrat women are such dogs!

21 posted on 03/23/2013 7:18:04 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Washington Redistributioners?


22 posted on 03/23/2013 7:18:56 AM PDT by Rick66 (Don't dislike me cause I live in Massholechusetts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

The truth is, most American Indians DO NOT CARE about the use of this type of name for mascots or sports teams. It is the very vocal minority who demand to get their way that get the attention. These people need to get a life. Right now they live to just get attention from Big Media.


23 posted on 03/23/2013 7:22:16 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Legislation to prevent the name "Redskins" from being trademarked? How foolish.

If the the name is such PC Kryptonite, who the heck else would want to use it in the first place?

Let the legislation pass. Then the Washington Redskins organization should tell the PC police to go p!$$ up a rope.

24 posted on 03/23/2013 7:23:27 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (The Constitution does not guarantee public safety, it guarantees liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Will we be able to always fry the French?


25 posted on 03/23/2013 7:28:37 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

When I get a sunburn do I have to refer to it as “skin of color”?


26 posted on 03/23/2013 7:30:03 AM PDT by albie (re)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

I would suggest Fudgepackers but Packers is too close


27 posted on 03/23/2013 7:30:54 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Black coffee will soon be verboten. We’ll have to order it “African American”.


28 posted on 03/23/2013 7:32:06 AM PDT by albie (re)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“And you can’t get redskin peanuts either!”

But,,,, redskin peanuts are a favorite snack of mine. Boiled in salted water, and eaten using chopsticks. Wonderful!


29 posted on 03/23/2013 7:32:13 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: C210N
Excellent.

I'd like to submit for consideration:
Washington Corruptocrats

30 posted on 03/23/2013 7:33:19 AM PDT by Amagi (Obama is never so animated as when he is assaulting the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

You could go with PooPushers...


31 posted on 03/23/2013 7:33:56 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: albie

[Black coffee will soon be verboten. We’ll have to order it “African American”.]

If the beans are from Columbia will it be Hispanic (non white) coffee?


32 posted on 03/23/2013 7:35:04 AM PDT by Pan_Yan (I love it when spell check selects every single word in my post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: albie

Damn, I take my coffee black...err colored.


33 posted on 03/23/2013 7:35:06 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: albie

In some parts, if you want black coffee, you order it “plain”. In other parts, you ask for it “black & barefoot”.


34 posted on 03/23/2013 7:35:13 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I agree. The should change the first part of their name and become the Landover Redskins, which is where they actually play. Move whatever offices and facilities they may have in DC to Maryland. And if Maryland doesn’t like, move to Virginia.


35 posted on 03/23/2013 7:36:07 AM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Obviously the NCAA has been doing this for years at the college level...that’s the NCAA headquartered in Inianapolis, Indiana.


36 posted on 03/23/2013 7:38:05 AM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“Nobody would let a comparable name to blacks stand,” Norton said”

Wait, I thought you couldn’t call them blacks, but this biotch does. You cannot call them ‘colored people’, yet the NAACP has that in their title. What a bunch of PC hypocrites!


37 posted on 03/23/2013 7:39:02 AM PDT by Batman11 (We came for the chicken sandwiches and a Sweet Tea Party broke out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Either the Redskin Peanuts, or the Libranazis


38 posted on 03/23/2013 7:43:39 AM PDT by inpajamas (http://outskirtspress.com/ONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Because The Washington Murderous Savages wouldn’t make it past the PC censors, I have been proposing:

The Washington Bitch-Set-Me-Ups

39 posted on 03/23/2013 7:46:23 AM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Redskins -> Ratskins


40 posted on 03/23/2013 7:46:42 AM PDT by RingerSIX (My wife and I took an AIDS vaccine that they offer down at our Church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson