Posted on 03/21/2013 6:23:20 AM PDT by RummyChick
are you saying it would have been more cost effective had he been overweight with high blood pressure and high cholesterol and maybe even diabetic with Alzheimer's? i'm sorry that i don't understand...
Some thoughts:
Reveal your weight, but not your height.
Reveal your weight on the moon.
Have them guess your weight and you get a prize off the top shelf if they are wrong.
I’m not an actuary, but I doubt that single instances weigh heavily on risk models for medical insurance.
Something the "dopers rights'" people never understand. Even if/when legalization comes, they may still find that they are unable to partake. Unless they play the homosexuals' game and claim it is a part of who they are and claim discrimination in the workplace.
Great question. Unfortunately, we know what the answer is since homosexuals are now officially a protected class.
Sooner or later, the bureaucrats will want to fine something you or me or others love to do. It started with the smokers and the smokers warned everyone that it wouldn't stop with them.
I like this concept. Wish my healthcare was billed in proportion to my actual health.
You can pick anything from this shelf, between here and here.
Eh. I’m glad President Reagan was fit enough to make it to at least age 78 without any serious health problems or obvious cognitive disability (he was even fit enough to survive a gunshot wound at age 70).
So it’s ok for CVS to make money off tobacco, booze, candy bars and soda but can ban their employees from consuming same?
I believe the health assessment asks questions about risky activities. I can’t recall. I haven’t filled mine out in a couple of years. I pay the extra premium. Life insurance policies also ask about risk activities.
I’m not arguing for or against here, only discussing the situation as it is now. I’d rather pay cash to my doctor and have my records be under my control.
oh, I get it! It’s a profit deal!
Where is that part?
If the employees sign a code-of-conduct or contract that prohibits them from consuming those products, then yes.
Well, I too am glad Reagan lived to be quite old, and I am not angry that he ran up his bill at the end. But these cost calculations don’t take into account the cost of many more people living to be really old. They are an excuse for control freaks to control things, and, as we have seen here, an opportunity for people to hate in an age where hating is a tightly regulated business.
Well, he would have not been hospitalised with Alzheimers for 10 years. Does that not cost anything?
That is absolutely correct. When the campaigns to stamp out smoking reach their goal, the campaigners will not disband and go back to playing pinochle. They will branch out and find new things to control. That is simply the kind of people they are.
My company has been doing it for the 3rd year now. I just pay the extra. First year it is revealing your weight, other health concerns, then they start offering a myriad of “health” classes that you get points for. Not worth my time to figure out how to fit it into my already busy life.
Well, to be consistent, CVS will have to pull all of the tobacco products, candy and salty snacks off their shelves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.