To: rellimpank
2 posted on
03/21/2013 5:38:09 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: rellimpank
(There was widespread skepticism that the ban would do much good)
Even liberals are saying what big hypocrites they are!
To: rellimpank
Summary: “We failed to exploit people’s emotions to ram through our top totalitarian goals, but we’re still going to try and push to get some of the lesser ones, despite the fact that none of them would have stopped the event we are supposedly so devastated over.”
4 posted on
03/21/2013 5:39:41 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
To: rellimpank
‘horrific” is sooooooooooooooooooo overused, I want to cringe when these numbskulls use it to describe everything
5 posted on
03/21/2013 5:43:00 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: rellimpank
Obama, Feinstein and crew are quickly learning the lesson, “Those that live by the low information voter, die by the low information voter.” The problem with counting on the low information voter to push your legislation over the finish line, is that they have attention spans that rarely last more than a week or two and disappear as soon as another “shiny object” is dangled in front of them. Yes the gun grabbers managed to get them all lathered up for a couple weeks after Newtown, but as soon as the pictures were gone off the TV screen so was the outrage and passion to do something.
8 posted on
03/21/2013 5:48:30 AM PDT by
apillar
To: rellimpank
“Even after the horrific slayings of schoolchildren in Connecticut in December”
The article lost all credibility right there. Why are 18 deaths in Connecticut horrific but the murder of 3000 children every day by the liberals in their abortionaries not horrific?
Until they start working against the murder of the unborn they have no right to talk about anything else.
9 posted on
03/21/2013 5:52:44 AM PDT by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: rellimpank
Now his goal is to pass bipartisan legislation to make gun trafficking a federal crime, It already is a fed crime. Transfering firearms accross state borders without using a federal firearms licensee is against the law.
I guess we need to make it really, really against the law.
11 posted on
03/21/2013 5:54:51 AM PDT by
umgud
To: afraidfortherepublic
12 posted on
03/21/2013 5:55:12 AM PDT by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: rellimpank
We still think there is value in sending a message that assault weapons and extended magazines are dangerous and unnecessary "Dangerous and unnecessary" - People who would rob us of our freedom.
21 posted on
03/21/2013 6:13:02 AM PDT by
Graybeard58
(_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson